Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 00:40:43 -0500
From: David Allen <s2mdalle@titan.vcu.edu>
To: gopher@complete.org
Subject: [gopher] Re: Gopher "robots.txt"
Message-ID: <20010115004043.A29080@mothra>
References: <20010114211300.A885@success-info.com>
 <200101150532.VAA09174@stockholm.ptloma.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i
In-Reply-To: <200101150532.VAA09174@stockholm.ptloma.edu>;
 from spectre@stockholm.ptloma.edu on Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 09:32:45PM -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org
Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: gopher@complete.org


On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 09:32:45PM -0800, Cameron Kaiser wrote:
> > It wouldn't be that much of a performance hit.  Rather than fetching the
> > directory with a normal gopher request, then fetching the attributes for
> > each entry of the directory, the robot could make a request something
> > like this:
> > 
> > 	1/directoryF$+VIEWS+ABSTRACT+ROBOTS

<snip>

> 
> This is a excellent idea, but I don't think we want to require all robots or
> robot-like things to be gopher+ compliant. It would be nice, but I don't
> think it should be mandatory.

Well if you're going to staple something new onto gopher, it makes
sense to do it in gopher+, rathern than modifiying the original gopher
with additions to it rather than gopher+, since after all gopher+ was
just a set of modifications to gopher. :)

> Also, this doesn't solve the problem adequately for those *servers* which are
> not gopher+ compliant, or certain subsets of indexed search servers that can't
> or don't make gopher+ compliant responses (I can think of several immediately).

Hm.  Well, I can agree with this, but at the same time, what is to
become of gopher+?  You can either merge it with the original gopher
and say "this is what gopher is, and we'll write software
accordingly", or you can throw out gopher+ and stick only with gopher,
but having gopher+ sitting around as something that might be supported
and might not be seems like a pain.  Gopher+ has some decent
abilities, and I don't see why you shouldn't use them in this
situation.  So maybe we should be asking if gopher+ is something that
should continue to be sometimes-supported, or if it should be taken in
or thrown out.

-- 
David Allen
http://opop.nols.com/
----------------------------------------
Official Project Stages:
        (1) Uncritical Acceptance
        (2) Wild Enthusiasm
        (3) Dejected Disillusionment
        (4) Total Confusion
        (5) Search for the Guilty
        (6) Punishment of the Innocent
        (7) Promotion of the Non-participants