Received: with LISTAR (v1.0.0; list gopher); Thu, 24 Jan 2002 09:32:27 -0500 (EST) Return-Path: Delivered-To: gopher@complete.org Received: from pluto2.runbox.com (pluto2.runbox.com [193.71.199.74]) by pi.glockenspiel.complete.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C9323B81D for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 09:32:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=runbox.com) by pluto2.runbox.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 16TkvA-0001rc-00 for gopher@complete.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 15:32:08 +0100 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Timm Murray" To: gopher@complete.org Subject: [gopher] Re: mime types Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 14:32:07 GMT X-Mailer: RMM Message-Id: X-archive-position: 393 X-listar-version: Listar v1.0.0 Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org X-original-sender: hardburn@runbox.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: gopher@complete.org List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Listar version 1.0.0 X-List-ID: Gopher List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: gopher > I just had a wacky thought - unrelated to the previous paragraph. Many of= you might=20 > have heard that some people have compiled a web server into the Linux ker= nel for=20 > some impressive speed gains... I wonder what compiling gopher into the li= nux kernel=20 > would be like. :) Kernel-level HTTP servers are great if you're only serving static HTML. Si= nce that isn't=20 too differnet from what Gopher does, I don't see why a kernel-level Gopher = server=20 wouldn't be different. >Anyone trying that? Betcha that would make slashdot... :) A replacement f= or NFS,=20 > perhaps? hmm... If you want a replacement for NFS, you have to use something that can map *= nix usernames and permissions on the files. You'll need more than just a s= tandard Gopher+ server for that