Received: with LISTAR (v1.0.0; list gopher); Sat, 12 Jan 2002 12:24:09 -0500 (EST) Return-Path: Delivered-To: gopher@complete.org Received: from stockholm.ptloma.edu (stockholm.ptloma.edu [199.106.86.50]) by pi.glockenspiel.complete.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94C683B81A for ; Sat, 12 Jan 2002 12:24:08 -0500 (EST) Received: (from spectre@localhost) by stockholm.ptloma.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) id JAA09884 for gopher@complete.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2002 09:28:24 -0800 From: Cameron Kaiser Message-Id: <200201121728.JAA09884@stockholm.ptloma.edu> Subject: [gopher] Re: Bucktooth and UMN gopher In-Reply-To: <873d1bh61w.fsf@complete.org> from John Goerzen at "Jan 12, 2 11:45:15 am" To: gopher@complete.org Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 09:28:24 -0800 (PST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL39 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-archive-position: 322 X-listar-version: Listar v1.0.0 Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org X-original-sender: spectre@stockholm.ptloma.edu Precedence: bulk Reply-to: gopher@complete.org List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Listar version 1.0.0 X-List-ID: Gopher List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: gopher > The thing is, though, that it is perfectly valid to reply to a Gopher+ > request with a Gopher0 menu. You could reply to UMN gopher with the > regular gopher0 menu that you reply to other things with. It didn't like it, though. As I recall, I got a client error (but not if I specified a direct resource, which led me to conclude that its default request was erroneous). -- ----------------------------- personal page: http://www.armory.com/~spectre/ -- Cameron Kaiser, Point Loma Nazarene University * ckaiser@stockholm.ptloma.edu -- Proponents of other opinions will be merrily beaten to a bloody pulp. ------