Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher); Thu, 10 Oct 2002 02:07:14 -0500 (EST) Return-Path: Delivered-To: gopher@complete.org Received: from aibo.runbox.com (aibo.runbox.com [193.71.199.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by gesundheit.complete.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E201561D47 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 02:07:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.9.9.110] (helo=snoopy.runbox.com) by tramp.runbox.com with esmtp (Exim 4.05-VA-mm1) id 17zXPX-0003Zv-00 for gopher@complete.org; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 09:07:07 +0200 Received: from [204.71.148.65] (helo=enterprise) (Authenticated Sender=hardburn) by snoopy.runbox.com with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 17zTa5-0003bh-00 for gopher@complete.org; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 05:01:46 +0200 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 From: Timm Murray To: gopher@complete.org Subject: [gopher] Re: Uploading Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 17:03:49 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.4] References: <200210091223.FAA28328@stockholm.ptloma.edu> In-Reply-To: <200210091223.FAA28328@stockholm.ptloma.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <200210091703.53365.hardburn@runbox.com> X-archive-position: 699 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org X-original-sender: hardburn@runbox.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: gopher@complete.org List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-ID: Gopher X-List-ID: Gopher List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: gopher -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 09 October 2002 07:23, Cameron Kaiser wrote: > > Are there any current standards for uploading via Gopher? I'm working on > > a new Gopher server and I'd like to have a nice, easy Perl command line > > program for uploading new content, but many of the protocols used just > > aren't good enough. FTP opens a big security risk, TFTP is too > > primitive, and SCP's Perl module doesn't support password authentication. > > Gopher upload would make everything integrate nicely. > > I don't think any clients support it, but theoretically, you could do this > using ASK protocol over Gopher+. The thing is, you would need to roll your > own app, but that shouldn't be very difficult. Ahh, I forgot about ASK. Yes, ASK would work perfectly with SRP authentication (RFC 2945). Which I find greatly ironic--not long ago, I was trying to implement SRP over HTTP and kept hitting the wall of trying to keep stateful information. ASK should nicely circumvent that problem. Thanks for reminding me :) - -- There should be an old-fasioned platform game starring Tux . . . and you hit the CD to toss Bill Gates into the lava and then see a little picture of RMS that says "Thanks for saving me Tux, but Linus Torvalds is in another castle!" --Seen on irc.openprojects.net, #debian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAj2kp8gACgkQqpueKcacfLQc7wCglLOOtoRbLYWZ6e/AE3nCUBUd hGQAoKrOfCq1IkGNpQnCxfhw3M4SwJPv =tZmG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----