Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher); Sun, 22 Jun 2003 02:35:18 -0500 (CDT) Return-Path: X-Original-To: gopher@complete.org Delivered-To: gopher@complete.org Received: by gesundheit.complete.org (Postfix, from userid 108) id C5E92183204B; Sun, 22 Jun 2003 02:35:16 -0500 (CDT) X-Scanned-By: clamscan at complete.org Received: from pongonova.net (12-237-214-195.client.attbi.com [12.237.214.195]) by gesundheit.complete.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D06651832044 for ; Sun, 22 Jun 2003 02:35:07 -0500 (CDT) Received: (qmail 5124 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2003 07:32:59 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO turquoise.pongonova.net) (500@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 22 Jun 2003 07:32:59 -0000 Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 02:32:55 -0500 To: gopher@complete.org Subject: [gopher] UMN gopher client bug resolved? Message-ID: <20030622073255.GA5116@pongonova.net> References: <008701c2d1ca$43452880$01000001@tyamamot2w> <20030211221952.GA17086@wile.excelhustler.com> <000801c2d22a$4da2ced0$01000001@tyamamot2w> <20030212033048.GA80668@gesundheit.complete.org> <003b01c2d2b0$c8bd4740$01000001@tyamamot2w> <004e01c2d4ba$fd95be50$01000001@tyamamot2w> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <004e01c2d4ba$fd95be50$01000001@tyamamot2w> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i From: Brian X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/0.57 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-archive-position: 771 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org X-original-sender: brian-keyword-gopher.6f04ff@pongonova.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: gopher@complete.org List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: Gopher X-List-ID: Gopher List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: gopher Does anybody know if this issue was ever resolved? I run into the same problems, which pretty much makes the gopher client useless (lots of dead gopher servers out there!). Any other gopher clients worth trying if there's not a patch for this? --Brian On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 03:25:02PM +0900, Taro Yamamoto wrote: > > I ran gdb to see what's happening. I found a very simple fact: connect() > didn't return, when accessing an inaccessible server. > For example, I could not reach the ip address: 128.101.103.43 (found for " > gopher.tc.umn.edu") at least from my machine. I confirmed it by trying it > with telnet. It didn't return. > > To stop accessing the server, I input Control-c, as I could not imagine > anything else. > Then, it seemed to be caught on the system level, and it damaged the > terminal and it began beeping, and the cpu started running at full speed. As > other processes became very slow, I had to kill the process. I didn't know > why the Control-c interrupt made the disaster. I'm going to test it > further... > > Regards, > > --Taro > > >