Message-ID: <422C6DCE.5030506@route-add.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 16:05:50 +0100
From: Alessandro Selli <dhatarattha@route-add.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS sun4u; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050105
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Gopher <gopher@complete.org>
Subject: [gopher] [Fwd: [Bug 285003] Mozilla ignores port number on Gopher
 URI]
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org
Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: gopher@complete.org

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71916

Oh well, it was quite well discussed before, three years ago!

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158888

Quite an interesting discussion, too.  Sound like an agreement was found 
in order to fix the "problem".  But it seems they didi not implement it.

   The final comment was:

 > ------- Additional Comment #13 From Bradley Baetz  2003-06-10 02:08
 > PST  [reply] -------
 >
 >mitch: see my comment #7. We now protect against this better and more
 > generally,
 >and we should be abel to remove the hack which was added just before
 > the
 >milestone freeze a couple of years ago.

   Comment #7 was:

 > ------- Additional Comment #7 From Bradley Baetz  2002-08-10 01:40 PST
 >  [reply] -------
 >
 >Mitch - we added the blocked ports list, but that was _after_ bug 71916
 >was
 >fixed (severel hours before the milestone freeze). I'm proposing to
 > back out the
 >fix for bug 71916 on the grounds that the blocked ports list now
 > prtocets
 >against that problem.

   So, weren't they supposed to rely on the blocked ports list, instead
of limiting Gopher to port 70?
   I also read:

 > ------- Additional Comment #4 From Roland Mainz  2003-03-20 09:47 PST
 >  [reply] -------
 >
 >Peter Tynan wrote:
 >> I for one would really like to see Gopher support fixed
 >
 >Then _VOTE_ for this bug
 >(http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/votes.cgi?action=show_user&bug_id=194220). 
 >And get
 >all your friend, enemies, etc. to vote for it, too (but: usually
 > mozilla.org
 >people don't care about bugzilla votes except you break the "50 votes"
 > barrier
 >(100 are better)) ... :)

   Well, votes are indeed lacking!

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [Bug 285003] Mozilla ignores port number on Gopher URI
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 00:57:13 -0800
From: bugzilla-daemon@mozilla.org
To: dhatarattha@route-add.net

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285003


ostgote@gmx.net changed:

            What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  CC|                            |ostgote@gmx.net


------- Additional Comments From ostgote@gmx.net  2005-03-07 00:57 PST 
-------
I guess this is because of Bug 71916 (only prot 70 is allowed). So this 
seems a
duplicate of Bug 158888 to me.

See also Bug 194220.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email


-- 
Alessandro Selli
Tel: 340.839.73.05
http://alessandro.route-add.net