Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher); Thu, 02 Jun 2005 14:05:12 -0500 (CDT) Received: from gatekeeper.excelhustler.com ([68.99.114.105] helo=excelhustler.com) by glockenspiel.complete.org with esmtps (with TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (No TLS peer certificate) (Exim 4.50) id 1Dduzy-0003dx-R7; Thu, 02 Jun 2005 14:05:05 -0500 Received: from wile.internal.excelhustler.com ([192.168.1.34]) by excelhustler.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Dduzn-0000IW-Aq; Thu, 02 Jun 2005 14:04:50 -0500 Received: by wile.internal.excelhustler.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1ED9D5EF05; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 14:04:46 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 14:04:46 -0500 From: John Goerzen To: gopher@complete.org Subject: [gopher] Re: CompressedFileHandler error Message-ID: <20050602190446.GJ342@excelhustler.com> References: <20050529203022.GA12706@pongonova.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050529203022.GA12706@pongonova.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Spam-Status: No (score -2.7): ALL_TRUSTED=-2.82, AWL=0.095 X-Virus-Scanned: by Exiscan on excelhustler.com at Thu, 02 Jun 2005 14:04:50 -0500 X-Spam-Status: No (score 0.0): AWL=0.022 X-Virus-Scanned: by Exiscan on glockenspiel.complete.org at Thu, 02 Jun 2005 14:05:05 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-archive-position: 1043 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org X-original-sender: jgoerzen@complete.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: gopher@complete.org List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: Gopher X-List-ID: Gopher List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: gopher On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 03:30:22PM -0500, brian@pongonova.net wrote: > Testing the CompressedFileHandler functionality...I'm running in a > chroot'd environment, have the appropriate lib/bin dirs in > /var/gopher for gzip to work. This is the stack trace I get when I > try to access a gzip'd file: Just out of curiousity, could you try this with Python 2.3? I am fairly certain it works fine there. -- John