Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher); Sun, 19 Jun 2005 08:51:24 -0500 (CDT) Received: from dns2.eurnetcity.net ([80.68.196.9]) by glockenspiel.complete.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Dk0Ck-0001cK-QV for gopher@complete.org; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 08:51:24 -0500 Received: from brillante.route-add.net (postfix@brillante.route-add.net [80.68.194.26] (may be forged)) by dns2.EurNetCity.NET (8.11.6p2-20030924/8.11.6) with SMTP id j5JDkHn29837 for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 15:46:17 +0200 Received: from [192.168.1.4] (marana [192.168.1.4]) by brillante.route-add.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CC3B1030 for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 15:50:28 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42B577F6.20101@route-add.net> Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 15:49:42 +0200 From: Alessandro Selli User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i586; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050531 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gopher@complete.org Subject: [gopher] Re: Gopher block! References: <20050529063117.GA10967@pongonova.net> <20050529193612.GL12306@pongonova.net> <20050602180533.GI342@excelhustler.com> In-Reply-To: <20050602180533.GI342@excelhustler.com> Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-EurNetCity-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-EurNetCity-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: dhatarattha@route-add.net X-Spam-Status: No (score 0.2): AWL=0.233 X-Virus-Scanned: by Exiscan on glockenspiel.complete.org at Sun, 19 Jun 2005 08:51:24 -0500 X-archive-position: 1044 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org X-original-sender: dhatarattha@route-add.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: gopher@complete.org List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: Gopher X-List-ID: Gopher List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: gopher John Goerzen wrote: > On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 02:36:12PM -0500, brian@pongonova.net wrote: [...] >> I often wonder where >>technology went wrong when it turned down the path of what I call >>"prerequisite complexity," something I see quite often in my IT life: >>The idea that technology requires ever-increasing complexity, whether >>or not the problem that is being solved actually warrants it. > > Indeed. See XML :-) Did I read right that they made /etc/inetd.conf (or was it inittab?) an XML file in Solaris10? Yuck! -- Alessandro Selli Tel: 340.839.73.05 http://alessandro.route-add.net