Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher); Wed, 17 Aug 2005 03:42:49 -0500 (CDT) Received: from nospam.wplus.net ([195.131.104.155] helo=emaile.wplus.net) by glockenspiel.complete.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1E5JVT-0004DF-FV for gopher@complete.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 03:42:47 -0500 Received: by emaile.wplus.net with drweb-scanned (WebPlus antispam mailer ) id 1E5JVD-0009Un-00 for gopher@complete.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 12:42:27 +0400 Received: from [195.131.85.158] (helo=home.peterstar.net) by emaile.wplus.net with esmtp (WebPlus antispam mailer ) id 1E5JVC-0009Ug-00 for gopher@complete.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 12:42:27 +0400 Received: (from rp@localhost) by home.peterstar.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) id LAA01659 for gopher@complete.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 11:05:46 +0400 Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 11:05:45 +0400 From: "R.A.Pavlov" To: gopher@complete.org Subject: [gopher] Re: NT gopher server Message-ID: <20050817110544.C435@freeshell.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from mahanam@comcast.net on Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 08:14:46PM -0700 X-IP: 195.131.85.158 X-From: webmaster@ankylym.ru X-Spam-Status: No (score 0.1): AWL=0.089 X-Virus-Scanned: by Exiscan on glockenspiel.complete.org at Wed, 17 Aug 2005 03:42:46 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-archive-position: 1084 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org X-original-sender: webmaster@ankylym.ru Precedence: bulk Reply-to: gopher@complete.org List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: Gopher X-List-ID: Gopher List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: gopher Bucktooth + Cygwin worked perfectly for me on Win2k Seems like I have already posted setup information in this mailing list, if you can't find it in the archives please contact me On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 08:14:46PM -0700, Andrew Mahan wrote: > Can anyone provide me with some leads on a good NT gopher server that will > run on W2k server? W2k does not have a "built in" server like NT 4.0 does. > I've tried GopherS but it does not work correctly with NAT (request are > pointed to the private IP rather than the public IP). Thanks for your help! > > > ~Andrew > > > -- Yours, etc. Roman A. Pavlov gopher://gopher.rp.spb.su