Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher); Thu, 18 Aug 2005 15:51:31 -0500 (CDT) Received: from gatekeeper.excelhustler.com ([68.99.114.105] helo=excelhustler.com) by glockenspiel.complete.org with esmtps (with TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (No TLS peer certificate) (Exim 4.50) id 1E5rME-0001vY-2J; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 15:51:30 -0500 Received: from wile.internal.excelhustler.com ([192.168.1.34] ident=postfix) by excelhustler.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1E5rLX-0000jh-47; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 15:50:48 -0500 Received: by wile.internal.excelhustler.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1450DA99F6; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 15:50:42 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 15:50:42 -0500 From: John Goerzen To: gopher@complete.org Subject: [gopher] Re: basic newb info Message-ID: <20050818205042.GC18778@excelhustler.com> References: <43036DA1.4000503@route-add.net> <200508172103.OAA13576@floodgap.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200508172103.OAA13576@floodgap.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Spam-Status: No (score -2.8): ALL_TRUSTED=-2.82 X-Virus-Scanned: by Exiscan on excelhustler.com at Thu, 18 Aug 2005 15:50:48 -0500 X-Spam-Status: No (score 0.0): AWL=0.018 X-Virus-Scanned: by Exiscan on glockenspiel.complete.org at Thu, 18 Aug 2005 15:51:30 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-archive-position: 1091 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org X-original-sender: jgoerzen@complete.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: gopher@complete.org List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: Gopher X-List-ID: Gopher List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: gopher On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 02:03:06PM -0700, Cameron Kaiser wrote: > > I'm still to investigate about "moles", maybe these could be used as > > well. Where did I read about them? I cannot find any reference in the > > documents I found in gopher://gopher.floodgap.com/1/gopher/tech, > > including ask.tar.Z. > > Darn, let's use Veronica2! Here it is: > > 'moles' are a Bucktoothism. I don't know what pygopherd calls their > equivalent functionality, or if they even act the same way (John presumably > can elucidate). Hmm, it's been a long time since I've looked at moles. Pygopherd supports at least the same thing that UMN gopherd does, as well as its own (PYG) modules that are dynamically loaded from Python scripts and executed within the server process (sorta a mod_gopher sort of thing). I seem to remember supporting moles in Pygopherd as well, but I'm away from my source tree at the moment and my memory isn't so good for that bit of code just now...