Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher); Thu, 05 Jan 2006 07:12:13 -0600 (CST) Received: from outbound2.mail.tds.net ([216.170.230.92]) by glockenspiel.complete.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EuUuY-0005U5-3J for gopher@complete.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 07:12:13 -0600 Received: from outaamta01.mail.tds.net (outaamta01.mail.tds.net [216.170.230.31]) by outbound2.mail.tds.net (8.13.4/8.12.2) with ESMTP id k05DC5eR027317 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2006 07:12:06 -0600 (CST) Received: from wybotnnas01-pool0-a247.wybotn.tds.net ([66.222.116.247]) by outaamta01.mail.tds.net with ESMTP id <20060105131204.NJPU29906.outaamta01.mail.tds.net@wybotnnas01-pool0-a247.wybotn.tds.net> for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2006 07:12:04 -0600 Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 07:12:19 -0600 To: gopher@complete.org Subject: [gopher] Re: Need for protocol changey References: <20060104230913.GA28833@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> From: Jeff Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20060104230913.GA28833@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> User-Agent: Opera M2/8.51 (Win32, build 7712) X-Spam-Status: No (score 0.1): AWL=0.073 X-Virus-Scanned: by Exiscan on glockenspiel.complete.org at Thu, 05 Jan 2006 07:12:13 -0600 X-archive-position: 1237 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org X-original-sender: geph@nerdshack.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: gopher@complete.org List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: Gopher X-List-ID: Gopher List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: gopher On Wed, 04 Jan 2006 17:09:13 -0600, Benn Newman wrote: > I have heard a lot of suggestions of changes to Gopher; my qustion is, > why? To address the failings of gopher+. Why are you opposed (if you are)? -- Jeff