Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher); Mon, 02 Jan 2006 13:54:31 -0600 (CST) Received: from mail.ellink.ru ([81.9.64.68]) by glockenspiel.complete.org with esmtps (with SSL 3.0:RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (No TLS peer certificate) (Exim 4.50) id 1EtVlC-0004x4-NQ for gopher@complete.org; Mon, 02 Jan 2006 13:54:30 -0600 Received: from [81.9.69.159] (HELO home) by mail.ellink.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5) with ESMTP id 59337563 for gopher@complete.org; Mon, 02 Jan 2006 22:53:44 +0300 Received-SPF: none receiver=mail.ellink.ru; client-ip=81.9.69.159; envelope-from=webmaster@ankylym.ru Received: (from rp@localhost) by home (8.8.7/8.8.7) id WAA09205 for gopher@complete.org; Mon, 2 Jan 2006 22:42:21 +0300 Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 22:42:20 +0300 From: "R.A.Pavlov" To: gopher@complete.org Subject: [gopher] Re: PyGopherd and Gopher+ Message-ID: <20060102224220.A7705@freeshell.org> Mail-Followup-To: gopher@complete.org References: <200601011724.JAA11584@floodgap.com> <20060102123224.E26748@freeshell.org> <20060102150628.GB7431@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20060102150628.GB7431@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG>; from newmanbe@sdf.lonestar.org on Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 09:06:28AM -0600 X-Spam-Status: No (score 0.0): none X-Virus-Scanned: by Exiscan on glockenspiel.complete.org at Mon, 02 Jan 2006 13:54:30 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-archive-position: 1220 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org X-original-sender: webmaster@ankylym.ru Precedence: bulk Reply-to: gopher@complete.org List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: Gopher X-List-ID: Gopher List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: gopher Yes I also couldn't find a good copy so I asked it from Steve Kostecke, the maintainer of kostecke.net gopher server (I don't remember whether it was also available from his gopher site) On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 09:06:28AM -0600, Benn Newman wrote: > On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 12:32:24PM +0300, R.A.Pavlov wrote: > > By the way, I think a nice extension of basic gopher protocol is > > implemented in GN gopher server - I have just installed it on local > > machine yesterday, played with it for a while and have been very > Where did you get it from. The archives on boombox are not all in the > best of condition, all the ones I tried seem corrupted. > -- > Benn Newman | newmanbe@sdf.lonestar.org | gopher://igneous-rock.homeunix.net > Wisconsin Association of Gopher Operators > Learn about the Gopher Project: http://gopher.quux.org/Software/Gopher > -- Attached file included as plaintext by Ecartis -- > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (NetBSD) > > iEYEARECAAYFAkO5QXQACgkQFE65lPR8xrFwNgCfVlhPZF70WKmZL9QBPIrOo4dF > YOEAnjD2+qbERtGgWJZOUF00FLrH9zCk > =Zmwh > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > -- Yours, etc. Roman A. Pavlov gopher://sdf.lonestar.org/1/users/rp