Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher); Tue, 04 Apr 2006 02:50:59 -0500 (CDT) Received: from smtp2.atlavia.it ([213.199.4.210] helo=smtp.atlavia.it) by glockenspiel.complete.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1FQgJT-0006Na-H8 for gopher@complete.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2006 02:50:57 -0500 Received: from kanthaka.localdomain (ppp-62-123-14-44.dial.atlanet.it [62.123.14.44] (may be forged)) by smtp.atlavia.it (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id k348QJD27691 for ; Tue, 4 Apr 2006 10:26:19 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by kanthaka.localdomain (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k347qRd2003019 for ; Tue, 4 Apr 2006 09:52:28 +0200 Message-ID: <443225BB.5030806@route-add.net> Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 09:52:27 +0200 From: Alessandro Selli User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060201 SeaMonkey/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gopher@complete.org Subject: [gopher] Re: Handling of ISO-8859-* character sets References: <442FB7C2.8000004@route-add.net> <20060403220315.M96004@aaronjangel.us> In-Reply-To: <20060403220315.M96004@aaronjangel.us> Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No (score 0.1): FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.05 X-Virus-Scanned: by Exiscan on glockenspiel.complete.org at Tue, 04 Apr 2006 02:50:57 -0500 X-archive-position: 1276 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org X-original-sender: dhatarattha@route-add.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: gopher@complete.org List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: Gopher X-List-ID: Gopher List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: gopher Aaron J. Angel wrote: > On Sun, 02 Apr 2006 13:38:42 +0200, Alessandro Selli wrote >> Hello, >> Before I run the risk of making a fool of myself and open a bug >> report that should not be opened, I need to know if someone of you >> can and is willing to give me an idea on how are ISO-8859 character >> sets handled in gopher menus. I think their correct display is left >> to the client, the server and the protocol do not take in account >> any particular character set, right? I'm wondering this because I >> noticed that Seamonkey 1.0 > > The Gopher RFC says selector names are of type UNASCII, that is: ASCII not > including tabs, CR-LFs, or NULs. I take this implies that a Gopher menu is to be considered a selector. -- Alessandro Selli Tel: 340.839.73.05 http://alessandro.route-add.net