Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher); Mon, 28 Aug 2006 17:04:37 -0500 (CDT) Received: from web35515.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([66.163.179.139]) by glockenspiel.complete.org with smtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GHpDO-0007Jh-Gw for gopher@complete.org; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 17:04:37 -0500 Received: (qmail 4155 invoked by uid 60001); 28 Aug 2006 22:03:46 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=h4SS1mVP6iQn9BIKwhD5uOsqolFTDDiTz2D2dADVyftNoklSz3/9FB9ouP69imuuRpzrCMwYCZqjkFa/5ky4DOF/RsXHBqMnyJucJoZypNVkKGZkXdMWABtwlhm1gcm83VRemfCz+lsa9ODRKiWC/glOI4aseiC2SuofVrB5xKw= ; Message-ID: <20060828220346.4153.qmail@web35515.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [209.216.94.5] by web35515.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 15:03:46 PDT Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 15:03:46 -0700 (PDT) From: JumpJet Mailbox Subject: [gopher] Re: test To: gopher@complete.org In-Reply-To: <20060828145346.078cc094@work1.hal3000.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No (score 2.3): AWL=0.077, FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD=2.174, HTML_30_40=0.056, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 X-Virus-Scanned: by Exiscan on glockenspiel.complete.org at Mon, 28 Aug 2006 17:04:37 -0500 X-archive-position: 1377 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org X-original-sender: jumpjetinfo@yahoo.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: gopher@complete.org List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: Gopher X-List-ID: Gopher List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: gopher No, I didn't see that post. I have been in touch with John Goerzen, and just like Cameron Kaiser and his FloodGap, I am not sure that hosting the archive would be a good thing for JumpJet. Like I suggested to Mr. Goerzen, I think the ideal solution would be to set up a dedicated Gopher Server just for, and ONLY for, this static archive. Due to the fact that this archive is really just the equivalent of a "backup tape", the requirements for a Server would be minimal (persons would not access this archive very often because the original source Servers would always be more up to date, and probably on a faster internet connections as well). I could easily see using an obsolete PC with a 60-80 Gb hard drive (an old Pentium 3 should be quite sufficient), on an inexpensive (i.e. slow) Internet connection. I would also recommend that the Veronica-2 index on FloodGap NOT index this server, as persons should always be going to the original source Servers first (this server should appear in the FloodGap "all the worlds Gopher holes" list though). JumpJet Chris wrote: Ok thats better :) Did anyone see my last post about possibilities of setting up a dedicated server for the gopher archives etc? Chris gopher://hal3000.cx On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 14:45:45 -0500 Chris wrote: > > just checking , didnt see my last post > -- > Join FSF as an Associate Member at: > > > > -- Join FSF as an Associate Member at: --------------------------------- Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less.