Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher); Wed, 06 Dec 2006 23:31:44 -0600 (CST) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.169]) by glockenspiel.complete.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) id 1GsBrA-0002qm-Am for gopher@complete.org; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 23:31:44 -0600 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id s2so362791uge for ; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 21:31:31 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=UBBMeGiaXAuOa5UWLfkTpRUO386/NSyGfGZciy+F7T78r2HocAX24npyqLHmcUsPHu7RA04XPLS9AeKbLaCr/ejOOwgAezF2I7Y+CDVy9x3qRV+I0qanuBjsrC53P6VQB/HNfLFTWYTDfeXm3WgigkOa5AI7WWVfY9OytcNjTw4= Received: by 10.66.216.20 with SMTP id o20mr2204711ugg.1165469490841; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 21:31:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?81.220.49.82? ( [81.220.49.82]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c1sm184572ugf.2006.12.06.21.31.29; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 21:31:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4577A72D.40702@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 06:31:25 +0100 From: Stegozor User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-US; rv:1.8.0.8) Gecko/20061030 SeaMonkey/1.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gopher@complete.org Subject: [gopher] Re: Yet another gopher browser for another OS: Arachne under DOS References: <200612061617.kB6GHd6J014976@floodgap.com> In-Reply-To: <200612061617.kB6GHd6J014976@floodgap.com> Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No (score 0.0): AWL=0.000 X-Virus-Scanned: by Exiscan on glockenspiel.complete.org at Wed, 06 Dec 2006 23:31:44 -0600 X-archive-position: 1442 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org X-original-sender: stegozor@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: gopher@complete.org List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: Gopher X-List-ID: Gopher List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: gopher Cameron Kaiser wrote: >> Maybe you should update to the latest version available at >> http://www.cisnet.com/glennmcc/arachne/a190j1.zip . 1.70 is rather outdated. > > Is it faster? One of my complaints is that Arachne is quite sluggish, even > considering this is a diminutive little 486DX/40. If 1.90j1 is speedier, > that's definitely a plus. Dunno, sorry. 1.90j1 is the first version I use. The only way to be sure for you is to upgrade and test. However, 1.90j1 is slow on my PC, maybe that has something to do with the fact that DOS can't handle multitasking. On the other hand, I used it after having booted from a diskette, so my DOS/Arachne configuration is anything but optimised... >> I'm thinking >> about mentioning the bug to Arachne developers, and useful information >> from a skilled gopher sysop would help (why in your opinion it's >> behaving the way it does, or anything I just can't imagine ;) > > At least for old-5k00l browsers, they usually implemented item type 7 in > HTML as . Naturally they don't do that anymore but I remember that > being the case for pre-Mozilla Netscape, at least. I don't know if Arachne > does that internally or not (haven't looked at the generated source and I'm > at work right now). The good with copying and pasting is that you don't need to understand what you're copying :)