Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 19:30:55 +0200
From: Christoph Lohmann <20h@r-36.net>
To: gopher@complete.org
Subject: [gopher] Re: Gopherfs and stuff
Message-ID: <20070502193055.3c48a33f@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <200705021631.l42GVS8C015144@floodgap.com>
References: <20070502173249.37620096@localhost>
	<200705021631.l42GVS8C015144@floodgap.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org
Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: gopher@complete.org

Good evening.

Am Wed, 2 May 2007 09:31:28 -0700 (PDT)
schrieb Cameron Kaiser <spectre@floodgap.com>:

> I don't understand why you are bothering then. It makes no sense to
> release a server program no one is "supposed to run" for a protocol
> you don't like, and won't support.

Read the copyright line in the source code. Nothing else applies.

> I'm all for more diversity in the gopher community, but your
> statements don't make any sense. I'm glad you're offering the choice,
> but you don't inspire much confidence in your work when there are
> other alternatives that are supported by enthusiasts, who do use
> them, and who believe the protocol offers certain advantages.

Use my gopherd! Sorry for the irony.

End of discussion.

Sincerely,

Christoph Lohmann