Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher);
 Wed, 01 Aug 2007 11:32:40 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from cc1021802-a.groni1.gr.home.nl ([82.73.133.177]
 helo=artemis.voidzero.net)
	by glockenspiel.complete.org with esmtp
	(Exim 4.63)
	id 1IGH7j-0000gZ-9N
	for gopher@complete.org; Wed, 01 Aug 2007 11:32:40 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by artemis.voidzero.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75EAF6198F5
	for <gopher@complete.org>; Wed,  1 Aug 2007 18:32:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from artemis.voidzero.net ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (artemis.lan [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id CQlfObGogH3r for <gopher@complete.org>;
	Wed,  1 Aug 2007 18:32:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:838:39b:1:248:2cff:fe3a:de4f] (anubis.voidzero.net
 [IPv6:2001:838:39b:1:248:2cff:fe3a:de4f])
	by artemis.voidzero.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CB786198F0
	for <gopher@complete.org>; Wed,  1 Aug 2007 18:32:32 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <46B0B5D5.9090409@w00f.eu>
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 18:33:25 +0200
From: Mark <mark@w00f.eu>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070720)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gopher@complete.org
Subject: [gopher] Re: Problem with SiMpLeMaChInEs
References: <f705f7020707312020g4a663f25xe9f24544ef661d9f@mail.gmail.com>
 <618171.61504.qm@web35503.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
 <20070801152758.GA18712@pongonova.net>
In-Reply-To: <20070801152758.GA18712@pongonova.net>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Status: No (score 1.7): AWL=-0.281, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=1.988
X-Virus-Scanned: by Exiscan on glockenspiel.complete.org at Wed,
 01 Aug 2007 11:32:40 -0500
X-archive-position: 1682
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org
Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org
X-original-sender: mark@w00f.eu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: gopher@complete.org
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@complete.org?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-Id: Gopher <gopher.complete.org>
X-List-ID: Gopher <gopher.complete.org>
List-subscribe: <mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=subscribe>
List-owner: <mailto:jgoerzen@complete.org>
List-post: <mailto:gopher@complete.org>
List-archive: <http://www.complete.org/mailinglists/archives/>
X-list: gopher

brian@pongonova.net wrote:
> Also, the word "should" doesn't mandate compliance. It's a
> recommendation.
>   
I agree; that's why it's called an RFC and not something else. :)

The port 70 discussion started because someone forwarded their port 70
internet to a different port on LAN? My idea about this, is that it is
never a good idea to run a service on a different internal port than
it's external port. This because it's a definite way to show
difficulties like the one being discussed now. A rather pointless
discussion anyway, imho. :)

--Mark