Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher); Sun, 23 Dec 2007 17:40:05 -0600 (CST) Received: from static-71-170-11-156.dllstx.dsl-w.verizon.net ([71.170.11.156] helo=turquoise.pongonova.net) by glockenspiel.complete.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) id 1J6aQN-0008Qn-Kr for gopher@complete.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2007 17:40:05 -0600 Received: by turquoise.pongonova.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 74540726; Sun, 23 Dec 2007 17:40:49 -0600 (CST) Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 17:40:49 -0600 From: brian@pongonova.net To: gopher@complete.org Subject: [gopher] Final dot required on server request? Message-ID: <20071223234049.GA10710@pongonova.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i X-Spam-Status: No (score 0.6): AWL=0.000, NO_REAL_NAME=0.55 X-Virus-Scanned: by Exiscan on glockenspiel.complete.org at Sun, 23 Dec 2007 17:40:05 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-archive-position: 1763 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org X-original-sender: brian@pongonova.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: gopher@complete.org List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: Gopher X-List-ID: Gopher List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: gopher I noticed that PyGopherd does not appear to send a final "." character prior to terminating the connection, but Bucktooth does. A quick read of the RFC leads me to believe the "." is to be expected. Has this been deprecated? It's not a big deal, just need to know how to write a bit of code to either expect or not expect the dot. --Brian