Received: with LISTAR (v1.0.0; list gopher); Tue, 24 Jul 2001 15:47:05 -0500 (EST) Return-Path: <jgoerzen@complete.org> Delivered-To: gopher@complete.org Received: from alexanderwohl.complete.org (unknown [168.215.193.242]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client CN "alexanderwohl.complete.org", Issuer CN "John Goerzen -- Root CA" (verified OK)) by pi.glockenspiel.complete.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D81943B813; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 15:46:59 -0500 (EST) Received: by alexanderwohl.complete.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5474577DA; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 15:47:01 -0500 (EST) To: gopher@complete.org Subject: [gopher] Re: Addresses on the mailing list References: <200107221903.MAA08364@stockholm.ptloma.edu> <87d76r7q0u.fsf@complete.org> <20010723210645.A539@volkerding.charter.net> From: John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org> Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 15:47:01 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20010723210645.A539@volkerding.charter.net> ("Adam Gurno"'s message of "Mon, 23 Jul 2001 21:06:45 -0500") Message-ID: <873d7m9hru.fsf@complete.org> Lines: 36 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) XEmacs/21.4 (Academic Rigor) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-archive-position: 200 X-listar-version: Listar v1.0.0 Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org X-original-sender: jgoerzen@complete.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: gopher@complete.org List-help: <mailto:listar@complete.org?Subject=help> List-unsubscribe: <mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=unsubscribe> List-software: Listar version 1.0.0 X-List-ID: Gopher <gopher.complete.org> List-subscribe: <mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=subscribe> List-owner: <mailto:jgoerzen@complete.org> List-post: <mailto:gopher@complete.org> List-archive: <http://www.complete.org/mailinglists/archives/> X-list: gopher

OK, I have made the change for current archives. I have not applied it retroactively as that is always rather touchy and makes me nervous. If people feel really strongly that it should be applied to older archives, I can try to do that too.

-- John

"Adam Gurno" <gurno@charter.net> writes:

> On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 08:07:13AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: >> >> I can look at it. mhonarc seems to have a spam mode. This will >> prevent searching the archive based on e-mail addresses. Would anyone >> else like this change? > > Count me in as someone who would prefer a change. > > Adam > > -- Attached file included as plaintext by Listar -- > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org > > iD4DBQE7XNgzHxMPauzOrZQRAv/EAJ9KxTIvENLMDi3FpTrbjjCdfPB4rACWNKht > gL5eBwCq+y4e2458AMBbWQ== > =yV/4 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > >

-- John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org> www.complete.org #include <std_disclaimer.h> GnuPG key 0x8A1D9A1F from www.complete.org/key