Received: with LISTAR (v1.0.0; list gopher); Fri, 05 Oct 2001 15:41:51 -0500 (EST) Return-Path: <x@mothra.dyndns.org> Delivered-To: gopher@complete.org Received: from mothra.dyndns.org (pool-141-152-10-249.rich.east.verizon.net [141.152.10.249]) by pi.glockenspiel.complete.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6094B3B871 for <gopher@complete.org>; Fri, 5 Oct 2001 15:41:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from x by mothra.dyndns.org with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 15pbg1-0005vN-00 for <gopher@complete.org>; Fri, 05 Oct 2001 16:34:33 -0400 Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 16:34:33 -0400 From: David Allen <mda@idatar.com> To: gopher@complete.org Subject: [gopher] Re: Taps for dead servers Message-ID: <20011005163433.A22770@mothra.dyndns.org> References: <200110052042.NAA11046@stockholm.ptloma.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200110052042.NAA11046@stockholm.ptloma.edu>; from spectre@stockholm.ptloma.edu on Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 01:42:13PM -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-archive-position: 215 X-listar-version: Listar v1.0.0 Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org X-original-sender: mda@idatar.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: gopher@complete.org List-help: <mailto:listar@complete.org?Subject=help> List-unsubscribe: <mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=unsubscribe> List-software: Listar version 1.0.0 X-List-ID: Gopher <gopher.complete.org> List-subscribe: <mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=subscribe> List-owner: <mailto:jgoerzen@complete.org> List-post: <mailto:gopher@complete.org> List-archive: <http://www.complete.org/mailinglists/archives/> X-list: gopher

On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 01:42:13PM -0700, Cameron Kaiser wrote: > > > Please remove your hats for the following confirmed down servers, as noted > by Veronica-2's audit this week (in no particular order):

(Moment of silence for the fallen gopherii)

Wow - you know one of the things that struck me when looking at that list was that it looks like there's > 2% of servers running on nonstandard (Read: != 70) ports. Is there any way you could do some sort of a quick grep to let us know roughly the percentage in the entire system where this is the case?

Also interesting was the one (or was it more than one) running on port 7070 - similar to HTTP monkeys putting their servers on 8080.

-- David Allen http://opop.nols.com/ ---------------------------------------- "We are all born originals -- why is it so many of us die copies?" --Edward Young