<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN"
"http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="index" title="Text File" newcontext="true">
<p>
Received: with LISTAR (v1.0.0; list gopher);
 Sat, 06 Oct 2001 01:27:28 -0500 (EST)
Return-Path: &lt;spectre@stockholm.ptloma.edu&gt;
Delivered-To: gopher@complete.org
Received: from stockholm.ptloma.edu (stockholm.ptloma.edu [199.106.86.50])
	by pi.glockenspiel.complete.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BD703B80B
	for &lt;gopher@complete.org&gt;; Sat,  6 Oct 2001 01:27:28 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from spectre@localhost)
	by stockholm.ptloma.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) id XAA07958
	for gopher@complete.org; Fri, 5 Oct 2001 23:32:10 -0700
From: Cameron Kaiser &lt;spectre@stockholm.ptloma.edu&gt;
Message-Id: &lt;200110060632.XAA07958@stockholm.ptloma.edu&gt;
Subject: [gopher] Re: Taps for dead servers
In-Reply-To: &lt;20011005163433.A22770@mothra.dyndns.org&gt; from David Allen at
 &quot;Oct 5, 1 04:34:33 pm&quot;
To: gopher@complete.org
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 23:32:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL39 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-archive-position: 218
X-listar-version: Listar v1.0.0
Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org
Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org
X-original-sender: spectre@stockholm.ptloma.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: gopher@complete.org
List-help: &lt;mailto:listar@complete.org?Subject=help&gt;
List-unsubscribe: &lt;mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=unsubscribe&gt;
List-software: Listar version 1.0.0
X-List-ID: Gopher &lt;gopher.complete.org&gt;
List-subscribe: &lt;mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=subscribe&gt;
List-owner: &lt;mailto:jgoerzen@complete.org&gt;
List-post: &lt;mailto:gopher@complete.org&gt;
List-archive: &lt;http://www.complete.org/mailinglists/archives/&gt;
X-list: gopher
</p>
<p></p>
<p>&gt; Wow - you know one of the things that struck me when looking at that
&gt; list was that it looks like there&#x27;s &gt; 2% of servers running on
&gt; nonstandard (Read: != 70) ports.  Is there any way you could do some
&gt; sort of a quick grep to let us know roughly the percentage in the
&gt; entire system where this is the case?
</p>
<p>mysql&gt; select count(*) from v2_stats where port != 70 ;
+----------+
| count(*) |
+----------+
|      126 |
+----------+
1 row in set (0.04 sec)
</p>
<p>mysql&gt; select count(*) from v2_stats ;
+----------+
| count(*) |
+----------+
|      509 |
+----------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
</p>
<p>Straight from the horse&#x27;s mouth, as it were :-)
</p>
<p>--
----------------------------- personal page: http://www.armory.com/~spectre/ --
 Cameron Kaiser, Point Loma Nazarene University * ckaiser@stockholm.ptloma.edu
-- The whippings shall continue until morale improves. ------------------------
</p>
</card>
</wml>
