<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN"
"http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="index" title="Text File" newcontext="true">
<p>
Received: with LISTAR (v1.0.0; list gopher);
 Mon, 11 Feb 2002 16:20:13 -0500 (EST)
Return-Path: &lt;luismbo@netcabo.pt&gt;
Delivered-To: gopher@complete.org
Received: from smtp.netcabo.pt (unknown [212.113.174.249])
	by pi.glockenspiel.complete.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 403C13B8AB
	for &lt;gopher@complete.org&gt;; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 16:20:12 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([213.22.99.119]) by smtp.netcabo.pt with
 Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.4617);
	 Mon, 11 Feb 2002 21:16:51 +0000
Subject: [gopher] Re: Gopher wishlist
From: Luis Oliveira &lt;luismbo@netcabo.pt&gt;
To: gopher@complete.org
In-Reply-To: &lt;3C682904.BF4BE07D@sympatico.ca&gt;
References: &lt;3C682904.BF4BE07D@sympatico.ca&gt;
Content-type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.1
Date: 11 Feb 2002 21:24:36 +0000
Message-Id: &lt;1013462677.15086.89.camel@home&gt;
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Feb 2002 21:16:51.0753 (UTC)
 FILETIME=[6C7E0990:01C1B341]
X-archive-position: 425
X-listar-version: Listar v1.0.0
Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org
Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org
X-original-sender: luismbo@netcabo.pt
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: gopher@complete.org
List-help: &lt;mailto:listar@complete.org?Subject=help&gt;
List-unsubscribe: &lt;mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=unsubscribe&gt;
List-software: Listar version 1.0.0
X-List-ID: Gopher &lt;gopher.complete.org&gt;
List-subscribe: &lt;mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=subscribe&gt;
List-owner: &lt;mailto:jgoerzen@complete.org&gt;
List-post: &lt;mailto:gopher@complete.org&gt;
List-archive: &lt;http://www.complete.org/mailinglists/archives/&gt;
X-list: gopher
</p>
<p></p>
<p>On Mon, 2002-02-11 at 20:26, Ralph Furmaniak wrote:
&gt;
&gt; Do we really have to stick to the gopher+ specs?  There are some things
&gt; that could be done differently, or new features added to the protocol.
&gt; We have practically all the maintainers of maintained gopher progs in
&gt; this group so why can&#x27;t we tinker with the protocol a bit?  If people
&gt; have some ideas of things they would like to see in gopher, we can try
&gt; to put these together.
</p>
<p>I agree. I&#x27;m very new to gopher and I kind of like it. I think that it
should be heavily improved now while there aren&#x27;t many gopher servers.
</p>
<p>--
Luis Oliveira
luismbo@netcabo.pt
</p>
<p></p>
</card>
</wml>
