Received: with LISTAR (v1.0.0; list gopher); Tue, 12 Feb 2002 13:31:35 -0500 (EST) Return-Path: <jgoerzen@complete.org> Delivered-To: gopher@complete.org Received: from erwin.complete.org (pcp947166pcs.cstltn01.in.comcast.net [68.58.145.248]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client CN "erwin.complete.org", Issuer CN "John Goerzen -- Root CA" (verified OK)) by pi.glockenspiel.complete.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 426C03B84B; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 13:31:35 -0500 (EST) Received: by erwin.complete.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4E65075836; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 13:31:34 -0500 (EST) To: gopher@complete.org Subject: [gopher] Re: UMN Gopher on Mac OSX References: <20020212130619.A9369@mothra.dyndns.org> From: John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org> Date: 12 Feb 2002 13:31:34 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20020212130619.A9369@mothra.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <87g046imbd.fsf@complete.org> Lines: 15 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-archive-position: 437 X-listar-version: Listar v1.0.0 Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org X-original-sender: jgoerzen@complete.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: gopher@complete.org List-help: <mailto:listar@complete.org?Subject=help> List-unsubscribe: <mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=unsubscribe> List-software: Listar version 1.0.0 X-List-ID: Gopher <gopher.complete.org> List-subscribe: <mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=subscribe> List-owner: <mailto:jgoerzen@complete.org> List-post: <mailto:gopher@complete.org> List-archive: <http://www.complete.org/mailinglists/archives/> X-list: gopher

Thanks for the info David. I'm finally downloading the dev tools to my PowerBook myself. (Yes, I know I promised this awhile back, sorry.)

What I'm curious about is whether the compilers included with fink (fink.sf.net, which I also have not installed) exhibit similar behavior, or if this is unique to the Apple tools. If fink behaves differently, then perhaps we can say that "compilation on Darwin is supported only with fink." Another possibility is to investigate whether gcc supports options to tell it "be case-sensitive, please" and whether there is a difference when running on HFS vs. UFS partitions. I intend to investigate all but the fink question shortly.

-- John