Received: with LISTAR (v1.0.0; list gopher); Tue, 12 Feb 2002 13:55:26 -0500 (EST) Return-Path: <rhahn@tenletters.com> Delivered-To: gopher@complete.org Received: from quarry.com (mail.quarry.com [205.189.158.4]) by pi.glockenspiel.complete.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 826F33B84B for <gopher@complete.org>; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 13:55:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from [205.189.158.32] (205.189.158.32) by quarry.com with ESMTP (Eudora Internet Mail Server 3.0.1) for <gopher@complete.org>; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 13:55:26 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: rhahn@mail.quarry.com Message-Id: <p0501041bb88f135fab02@[205.189.158.32]> In-Reply-To: <20020212130619.A9369@mothra.dyndns.org> References: <20020212130619.A9369@mothra.dyndns.org> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 13:55:28 -0500 To: gopher@complete.org From: Robert Hahn <rhahn@tenletters.com> Subject: [gopher] Re: UMN Gopher on Mac OSX Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-archive-position: 438 X-listar-version: Listar v1.0.0 Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org X-original-sender: rhahn@tenletters.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: gopher@complete.org List-help: <mailto:listar@complete.org?Subject=help> List-unsubscribe: <mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=unsubscribe> List-software: Listar version 1.0.0 X-List-ID: Gopher <gopher.complete.org> List-subscribe: <mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=subscribe> List-owner: <mailto:jgoerzen@complete.org> List-post: <mailto:gopher@complete.org> List-archive: <http://www.complete.org/mailinglists/archives/> X-list: gopher

Wow! David, thanks for reporting the progress you've made on this. I would never have guessed that, although I was suspicious about the coincidence between regex.h and Regex.h.

>OK, so here's the main problem, which anybody familiar with C isn't >going to believe. :)

Well, now that you explained it, I believe it. You see, HFS is a case-insensitive FS, (as John's post mentioned) so however Apple's flavour of gcc (which, BTW, is rolled into the same source tree all gcc's use) is programmed, they decided to be blind to case insensitivity.

Bummer. I would give anything to run OS X on UFS, largely for this reason, but the last time I tried, performance was *severely* degraded. :( 'course, they may have fixed that in the last 3-4 releases, but I haven't had a spare partition to try it out with...

guess I'll submit this bug report to Apple. :)

and that uptime one too... if I can replicate it on my system. -rh -- --- Robert Hahn, Quarry Integrated Communications (519)743-4300 x2235 rhahn@quarry.com