Received: with LISTAR (v1.0.0; list gopher); Tue, 12 Feb 2002 14:41:54 -0500 (EST) Return-Path: <x@mothra.dyndns.org> Delivered-To: gopher@complete.org Received: from mothra.dyndns.org (pool-141-152-12-174.rich.east.verizon.net [141.152.12.174]) by pi.glockenspiel.complete.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64F843B860 for <gopher@complete.org>; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 14:41:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from x by mothra.dyndns.org with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16ailq-0002fF-00 for <gopher@complete.org>; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 14:39:18 -0500 Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 14:39:18 -0500 From: David Allen <mda@idatar.com> To: gopher@complete.org Subject: [gopher] Re: UMN Gopher on Mac OSX Message-ID: <20020212143918.A10221@mothra.dyndns.org> References: <20020212130619.A9369@mothra.dyndns.org> <87g046imbd.fsf@complete.org> <p0501041cb88f19d42f5d@[205.189.158.32]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <p0501041cb88f19d42f5d@[205.189.158.32]>; from rhahn@quarry.com on Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 02:22:06PM -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-archive-position: 442 X-listar-version: Listar v1.0.0 Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org X-original-sender: mda@idatar.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: gopher@complete.org List-help: <mailto:listar@complete.org?Subject=help> List-unsubscribe: <mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=unsubscribe> List-software: Listar version 1.0.0 X-List-ID: Gopher <gopher.complete.org> List-subscribe: <mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=subscribe> List-owner: <mailto:jgoerzen@complete.org> List-post: <mailto:gopher@complete.org> List-archive: <http://www.complete.org/mailinglists/archives/> X-list: gopher

On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 02:22:06PM -0500, Robert Hahn wrote: > > If anyone has the resources (I don't at the moment) I would also be > interested in knowing whether gopher 3.0.2 compiles on OS X without > changes if the drive format is UFS.

Unlikely - because there are still the linking issues, and also the compilation issues related to <malloc.h>. So getting rid of the case insensitivity problem is one thing, but not the whole thing.

It should be the case though that with UFS just a few changes would be needed. Hopefully these won't be changes that affect any other platforms so they'll be pretty straightforward.

-- David Allen http://opop.nols.com/ ---------------------------------------- Speak softly and carry a +6 two-handed sword.