<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN"
"http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="index" title="Text File" newcontext="true">
<p>
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher);
 Wed, 20 Mar 2002 20:03:45 -0500 (EST)
Return-Path: &lt;abg@charter.net&gt;
Delivered-To: gopher@complete.org
Received: from dc-mx01.cluster1.charter.net (dc-mx01.cluster0.hsacorp.net
 [209.225.8.11])
	by pi.glockenspiel.complete.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E20273B8BE
	for &lt;gopher@complete.org&gt;; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 20:03:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [24.241.116.69] (HELO charter.net)
  by dc-mx01.cluster1.charter.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.3)
  with ESMTP id 27178978 for gopher@complete.org;
 Wed, 20 Mar 2002 20:12:10 -0500
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 06:59:00 -0600 (CST)
From: gurno@charter.net
Subject: [gopher] Re: The road ahead
To: gopher@complete.org
In-Reply-To: &lt;20020320165126.A2219@mothra.dyndns.org&gt;
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain
Message-ID: &lt;auto-000027178978@dc-mx01.cluster1.charter.net&gt;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-archive-position: 518
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org
Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org
X-original-sender: gurno@charter.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: gopher@complete.org
List-help: &lt;mailto:ecartis@complete.org?Subject=help&gt;
List-unsubscribe: &lt;mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=unsubscribe&gt;
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-ID: Gopher &lt;gopher.complete.org&gt;
X-List-ID: Gopher &lt;gopher.complete.org&gt;
List-subscribe: &lt;mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=subscribe&gt;
List-owner: &lt;mailto:jgoerzen@complete.org&gt;
List-post: &lt;mailto:gopher@complete.org&gt;
List-archive: &lt;http://www.complete.org/mailinglists/archives/&gt;
X-list: gopher
</p>
<p>On 20 Mar, David Allen wrote:
</p>
<p>[snip]
&gt; When making protocol changes, I think this question is important:
&gt; &quot;what is gopher to you?&quot;  What should gopher be able to do?  What
&gt; areas should it not mess with?  Which parts of Gopher+ were good, and
&gt; which were just lousy ideas?
</p>
<p>If anything, I&#x27;d like to keep Gopher mostly as-is, but fix some of the
deficiencies with better ideas that have come along since the
original...
</p>
<p>+ I&#x27;d like a well-defined way to send descriptive strings - i.e. the
&#x27;info&#x27;, only defined as such.  What I&#x27;m trying to say is that using info
seems &#x27;kludgey&#x27; to me and I&#x27;d like a better way to say &quot;Welcome to my
Gopherhole!&quot;.
</p>
<p>+ A page title would be nice too - I think that this would be extremely
helpful when bookmarking.
</p>
<p>+ Fully qualified URLs for links.  Rather than breaking it up across
tabs, I would much rather see ...\tgopher://foo.foo/1:8080 - I think
that it&#x27;s easier to maintain and much more readable.
</p>
<p>+ And I think that the Google-ization of the Web has shown that helpful
searching is the &#x27;killer app&#x27;.  With that in mind, meta information
about a page, like the Keywords and Descriptions available if the robot
would want it.  (Clients don&#x27;t really care, do they?)
</p>
<p>+ What sort of character support is out there?  The &#x27;net is fa-a-ar more
international than it was back in the day - I think we need more than
UTF-8 (or whatever)
</p>
<p>What I *don&#x27;t* want to see:
</p>
<p>- The ability for the Client to send (much) information back.  Sorry, I
  know that this is a popular thing with people.  This sort of thing
  raises the complexity immediately for both the clients and server.
  This breaks the &#x27;dumb&#x27; client, smart server idea that was mentioned in
  the Gopher specs way back when.  It&#x27;s also opens the door for many
  things that I think are wrong with the web - cookies, tracking, etc.
  If you want state data, go to the web.
</p>
<p>- Formatting information.  I&#x27;d support a simple left|center|right
  alignment for the text strings (see above), but outside of that we&#x27;d
  be setting ourself up for the HTML/CSS/Flash wars that are raging
  right now.  (This includes fonts)
</p>
<p>That&#x27;s all I can think of now.  How about some name ideas - since we&#x27;re
treading on a new spec that&#x27;s a break from the old one, how about
&quot;Gopher?&quot; ;^)  &quot;Gopher2&quot; would be a good one also.  (&quot;Gopher!&quot;, to drive
home the point...)
</p>
<p>Adam
</p>
<p></p>
<p>--
Adam Gurno
adam@gurno.com
GPG Key: http://gurno.com/adam/adam.txt
</p>
<p></p>
<p>-- Attached file included as plaintext by Ecartis --
</p>
<p>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (OpenBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
</p>
<p>iD8DBQA8mdklzVXw0LoBcvkRAmEEAJ96ooFvZTvgBkrzTvsfH/fjOxlOLQCeOE5h
EffAqXc1BJNs7JkSj5MInMs=
=WtCX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
</card>
</wml>
