<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN"
"http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="index" title="Text File" newcontext="true">
<p>
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher);
 Fri, 05 Apr 2002 12:32:22 -0500 (EST)
Return-Path: &lt;tlong2us@yahoo.com&gt;
Delivered-To: gopher@complete.org
Received: from web21110.mail.yahoo.com (web21110.mail.yahoo.com
 [216.136.227.112])
	by pi.glockenspiel.complete.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 62E503B80B
	for &lt;gopher@complete.org&gt;; Fri,  5 Apr 2002 12:32:22 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: &lt;20020405173221.14591.qmail@web21110.mail.yahoo.com&gt;
Received: from [24.151.43.215] by web21110.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP;
 Fri, 05 Apr 2002 09:32:21 PST
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 09:32:21 -0800 (PST)
From: Thomas Long &lt;tlong2us@yahoo.com&gt;
Subject: [gopher] Re: Pygopherd nearing gopherd replacement
To: gopher@complete.org
In-Reply-To: &lt;0CF95C35-48A3-11D6-857D-0003930BF072@complete.org&gt;
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-archive-position: 562
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org
Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org
X-original-sender: tlong2us@yahoo.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: gopher@complete.org
List-help: &lt;mailto:ecartis@complete.org?Subject=help&gt;
List-unsubscribe: &lt;mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=unsubscribe&gt;
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-ID: Gopher &lt;gopher.complete.org&gt;
X-List-ID: Gopher &lt;gopher.complete.org&gt;
List-subscribe: &lt;mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=subscribe&gt;
List-owner: &lt;mailto:jgoerzen@complete.org&gt;
List-post: &lt;mailto:gopher@complete.org&gt;
List-archive: &lt;http://www.complete.org/mailinglists/archives/&gt;
X-list: gopher
</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>  John Goerzen &lt;jgoerzen@complete.org&gt; wrote: PLEASE REMOVE ME FROM THIS GROUP. NOT SURE HOW I GOT ON BUT OVER MY HEAD. EVEN FOR LURKING! LOL
On Thursday, April 4, 2002, at 10:47 PM, Timm Murray wrote:
</p>
<p>&gt; Python saves the compiled output of the script after the first run, so
&gt; new =
&gt; runs of the=20
&gt; script should run at near native speeds anyway.
</p>
<p>Well, yes and no. Python does not save native machine code, it saves
Python bytecode -- similar in concept to Java bytecode. This still gets
interpreted -- it just saves the parsing step, which generally only
reduces program load time.
</p>
<p>This can be a win if you&#x27;re on a really slow machine or if you&#x27;re
invoking it a LOT (ie, a CGI), but otherwise the difference is generally
unnoticeable.
</p>
<p>-- John
</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>---------------------------------
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
</p>
<p></p>
</card>
</wml>
