Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher); Mon, 08 Apr 2002 16:31:55 -0500 (EST) Return-Path: <jgoerzen@complete.org> Delivered-To: gopher@complete.org Received: from christoph.complete.org (unknown [168.215.193.254]) by pi.glockenspiel.complete.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA8D83B80B for <gopher@complete.org>; Mon, 8 Apr 2002 16:31:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by christoph.complete.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B822E5A2DF for <gopher@complete.org>; Mon, 8 Apr 2002 16:31:59 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 16:31:59 -0500 Subject: [gopher] Re: Pygopherd 0.5.0 available Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v481) From: John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org> To: gopher@complete.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <3CB20A3A.CB724194@sympatico.ca> Message-Id: <0EE11B60-4B38-11D6-8E97-0003930BF072@complete.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.481) X-archive-position: 578 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org X-original-sender: jgoerzen@complete.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: gopher@complete.org List-help: <mailto:ecartis@complete.org?Subject=help> List-unsubscribe: <mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=unsubscribe> List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-ID: Gopher <gopher.complete.org> X-List-ID: Gopher <gopher.complete.org> List-subscribe: <mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=subscribe> List-owner: <mailto:jgoerzen@complete.org> List-post: <mailto:gopher@complete.org> List-archive: <http://www.complete.org/mailinglists/archives/> X-list: gopher

It's not in 0.5.0 yet, but I expect the next version will support both UMN- and Bucktooth-style executables. I do not, however, plan to support UMN exec:"args" format links, since they are insecure. This support is one of many easy-to-do things on the TODO list :-)

By the time it is complete, you should be able to run either a Bucktooth dbrowse (assuming you have the requisite libraries installed) or a PYG one.

-- John

On Monday, April 8, 2002, at 04:23 PM, Ralph Furmaniak wrote:

> > PYGs look nice, but how is the support for non-python scripts? > >