Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher); Mon, 30 Jun 2003 05:20:30 -0500 (CDT) Return-Path: <killspy@roelisch.tmfweb.nl> X-Original-To: gopher@complete.org Delivered-To: gopher@complete.org Received: by gesundheit.complete.org (Postfix, from userid 108) id 83C8D18320A5; Mon, 30 Jun 2003 05:20:29 -0500 (CDT) X-Scanned-By: clamscan at complete.org Received: from netlx014.civ.utwente.nl (netlx014.civ.utwente.nl [130.89.1.88]) by gesundheit.complete.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9538183203C for <gopher@complete.org>; Mon, 30 Jun 2003 05:20:25 -0500 (CDT) Received: from killspy (kabel218067.mobiel.utwente.nl [130.89.218.67]) by netlx014.civ.utwente.nl (8.11.4/HKD) with SMTP id h5UAI3i00216 for <gopher@complete.org>; Mon, 30 Jun 2003 12:18:03 +0200 Message-ID: <004001c33ef0$e45c1920$43da5982@killspy> From: "Ruliz Galaxor" <killspy@roelisch.tmfweb.nl> To: <gopher@complete.org> References: <200306290131.SAA30706@floodgap.com> Subject: [gopher] Re: bot's running Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 12:18:02 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-UTwente-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-archive-position: 777 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org X-original-sender: killspy@roelisch.tmfweb.nl Precedence: bulk Reply-to: gopher@complete.org List-help: <mailto:ecartis@complete.org?Subject=help> List-unsubscribe: <mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=unsubscribe> List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: Gopher <gopher.complete.org> X-List-ID: Gopher <gopher.complete.org> List-subscribe: <mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=subscribe> List-owner: <mailto:jgoerzen@complete.org> List-post: <mailto:gopher@complete.org> List-archive: <http://www.complete.org/mailinglists/archives/> X-list: gopher

Hiya,

Yes, I noticed... and I have a small question or actually favor to ask... because I'm currently using the system in which the type of request should also be present (e.g. 0/robots.txt). so could the bot both check for robots.txt and 0/robots.txt? or is that a problem?

Besides that I'm currently rewriting my server from the requests with type declaration to requests without type declaration, so it's not really that big deal, but heh, I'm just providing feedback :P

greets and keep on the great work,

Ruliz gopher@roelisch.tmfweb.nl gopher://kabel218067.mobiel.utwente.nl

----- Original Message ----- From: "Cameron Kaiser" <spectre@floodgap.com> To: <gopher@complete.org> Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2003 3:31 AM Subject: [gopher] bot's running

> In case you didn't notice ... > > It may appear as either helsinki.floodgap.com or > netblock-66-159-214-138.dslextreme.com.