Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher); Thu, 28 Aug 2003 10:06:36 -0500 (CDT) Return-Path: <papalazarus@f2s.com> X-Original-To: gopher@complete.org Delivered-To: gopher@complete.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gesundheit.complete.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 657EB18320AA for <gopher@complete.org>; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 10:06:35 -0500 (CDT) Received: from server0027.freedom2surf.net (server0027.freedom2surf.net [194.106.33.36]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by gesundheit.complete.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F09B183209C for <gopher@complete.org>; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 10:06:33 -0500 (CDT) Received: from KITCHEN ([195.137.30.34]) by server0027.freedom2surf.net (8.12.6/8.12.6/Debian-7) with ESMTP id h7SF6Oiv009185 for <gopher@complete.org>; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 15:06:26 GMT To: gopher@complete.org Subject: [gopher] Re: PyGopherd 2.0 released; Gopher and WAP References: <317e848112f34d7f185bcf056962c88d@Bouncing> Message-ID: <oprumewsj9oh6hmd@localhost> Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 From: PapaLazarus <papalazarus@f2s.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 16:06:18 +0100 In-Reply-To: <317e848112f34d7f185bcf056962c88d@Bouncing> User-Agent: Opera7.10/Win32 M2 build 2840 X-Scanned-By: clamscan at complete.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-archive-position: 812 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org X-original-sender: papalazarus@f2s.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: gopher@complete.org List-help: <mailto:ecartis@complete.org?Subject=help> List-unsubscribe: <mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=unsubscribe> List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: Gopher <gopher.complete.org> X-List-ID: Gopher <gopher.complete.org> List-subscribe: <mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=subscribe> List-owner: <mailto:jgoerzen@complete.org> List-post: <mailto:gopher@complete.org> List-archive: <http://www.complete.org/mailinglists/archives/> X-list: gopher

On 2003-08-28 15:14:52 +0100 PapaLazarus wrote: >> A pictures worth a thousand words, well maps & diagrams.

On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 15:37:04 +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > I agree entirely....... > I think gopher probably will come out ahead on access speed for most > tasks usually done on mobiles, from combining lots of reasons. As > has been said, there's quite a few similar solutions in WAP interfaces > as gopher ones.

Who do I have to sleep_with\lobby to get date services on mobile phones chargeged by the data rather then by time?