<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN"
"http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="index" title="Text File" newcontext="true">
<p>
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher);
 Wed, 19 Jan 2005 19:59:05 -0600 (CST)
Received: from jgoerzen by glockenspiel.complete.org with local
	(Exim 4.34)
	id 1CrRbE-0000Y4-OQ; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 19:59:04 -0600
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 19:59:04 -0600
From: John Goerzen &lt;jgoerzen@complete.org&gt;
To: gopher@complete.org
Subject: [gopher] Re: pygopherd OK with python-2.4 ?
Message-ID: &lt;20050120015904.GD2051@complete.org&gt;
References: &lt;41edac8b.KfeN2YNN1S1NEHfJ%beaker@freeshell.org&gt;
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: &lt;41edac8b.KfeN2YNN1S1NEHfJ%beaker@freeshell.org&gt;
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-archive-position: 1007
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org
Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org
X-original-sender: jgoerzen@complete.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: gopher@complete.org
List-help: &lt;mailto:ecartis@complete.org?Subject=help&gt;
List-unsubscribe: &lt;mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=unsubscribe&gt;
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-Id: Gopher &lt;gopher.complete.org&gt;
X-List-ID: Gopher &lt;gopher.complete.org&gt;
List-subscribe: &lt;mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=subscribe&gt;
List-owner: &lt;mailto:jgoerzen@complete.org&gt;
List-post: &lt;mailto:gopher@complete.org&gt;
List-archive: &lt;http://www.complete.org/mailinglists/archives/&gt;
X-list: gopher
</p>
<p>On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 04:40:43PM -0800, Jeff_W wrote:
&gt; &gt; I have developed PyGopherd to be a plug-in replacement for UMN
&gt; &gt; gopherd.  Its configuration file is different, but it can be set
&gt; &gt; to understand a complete UMN directory structure.
&gt;
&gt; Ok, I&#x27;ll give pygopherd a try; can I use the latest version
&gt; of python (2.4)?  It&#x27;ll be running on an old sparc w/ NetBSD;
&gt; anyone know of any issues I ought to consider with such a setup?
</p>
<p>I don&#x27;t think it&#x27;s been tried yet, but I also have no reason to believe
it would break horribly.  If it does break, chances are it would break
quick and you&#x27;d know it.
</p>
<p>-- John
</p>
<p></p>
</card>
</wml>
