<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN"
"http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="index" title="Text File" newcontext="true">
<p>
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher);
 Mon, 07 Mar 2005 09:06:17 -0600 (CST)
Received: from dns2.eurnetcity.net ([80.68.196.9])
	by glockenspiel.complete.org with esmtp
	(Exim 4.34)
	id 1D8JoA-0004ms-F2
	for gopher@complete.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 09:06:17 -0600
Received: from brillante.route-add.net (postfix@brillante.route-add.net
 [80.68.194.26] (may be forged))
	by dns2.EurNetCity.NET (8.11.6p2-20030924/8.11.6) with SMTP id j27EpPV04367
	for &lt;gopher@complete.org&gt;; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 15:51:25 +0100
Received: from sole.localdomain (sole.localdomain [192.168.1.6])
	by brillante.route-add.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC2111031
	for &lt;gopher@complete.org&gt;; Mon,  7 Mar 2005 16:05:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ambapali@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sole.localdomain (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j27F5rAa001038
	for &lt;gopher@complete.org&gt;; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 16:05:54 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: &lt;422C6DCE.5030506@route-add.net&gt;
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 16:05:50 +0100
From: Alessandro Selli &lt;dhatarattha@route-add.net&gt;
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS sun4u; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050105
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Gopher &lt;gopher@complete.org&gt;
Subject: [gopher] [Fwd: [Bug 285003] Mozilla ignores port number on Gopher
 URI]
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-EurNetCity-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more
 information
X-EurNetCity-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: dhatarattha@route-add.net
X-Spam-Status: No (score 0.0): AWL=0.005
X-Virus-Scanned: by Exiscan on glockenspiel.complete.org at Mon,
 07 Mar 2005 09:06:17 -0600
X-archive-position: 1026
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org
Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org
X-original-sender: dhatarattha@route-add.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: gopher@complete.org
List-help: &lt;mailto:ecartis@complete.org?Subject=help&gt;
List-unsubscribe: &lt;mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=unsubscribe&gt;
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-Id: Gopher &lt;gopher.complete.org&gt;
X-List-ID: Gopher &lt;gopher.complete.org&gt;
List-subscribe: &lt;mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=subscribe&gt;
List-owner: &lt;mailto:jgoerzen@complete.org&gt;
List-post: &lt;mailto:gopher@complete.org&gt;
List-archive: &lt;http://www.complete.org/mailinglists/archives/&gt;
X-list: gopher
</p>
<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71916
</p>
<p>Oh well, it was quite well discussed before, three years ago!
</p>
<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158888
</p>
<p>Quite an interesting discussion, too.  Sound like an agreement was found
in order to fix the &quot;problem&quot;.  But it seems they didi not implement it.
</p>
<p>   The final comment was:
</p>
<p> &gt; ------- Additional Comment #13 From Bradley Baetz  2003-06-10 02:08
 &gt; PST  [reply] -------
 &gt;
 &gt;mitch: see my comment #7. We now protect against this better and more
 &gt; generally,
 &gt;and we should be abel to remove the hack which was added just before
 &gt; the
 &gt;milestone freeze a couple of years ago.
</p>
<p>   Comment #7 was:
</p>
<p> &gt; ------- Additional Comment #7 From Bradley Baetz  2002-08-10 01:40 PST
 &gt;  [reply] -------
 &gt;
 &gt;Mitch - we added the blocked ports list, but that was _after_ bug 71916
 &gt;was
 &gt;fixed (severel hours before the milestone freeze). I&#x27;m proposing to
 &gt; back out the
 &gt;fix for bug 71916 on the grounds that the blocked ports list now
 &gt; prtocets
 &gt;against that problem.
</p>
<p>   So, weren&#x27;t they supposed to rely on the blocked ports list, instead
of limiting Gopher to port 70?
   I also read:
</p>
<p> &gt; ------- Additional Comment #4 From Roland Mainz  2003-03-20 09:47 PST
 &gt;  [reply] -------
 &gt;
 &gt;Peter Tynan wrote:
 &gt;&gt; I for one would really like to see Gopher support fixed
 &gt;
 &gt;Then _VOTE_ for this bug
 &gt;(http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/votes.cgi?action=show_user&amp;bug_id=194220).
 &gt;And get
 &gt;all your friend, enemies, etc. to vote for it, too (but: usually
 &gt; mozilla.org
 &gt;people don&#x27;t care about bugzilla votes except you break the &quot;50 votes&quot;
 &gt; barrier
 &gt;(100 are better)) ... :)
</p>
<p>   Well, votes are indeed lacking!
</p>
<p>-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [Bug 285003] Mozilla ignores port number on Gopher URI
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 00:57:13 -0800
From: bugzilla-daemon@mozilla.org
To: dhatarattha@route-add.net
</p>
<p>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285003
</p>
<p></p>
<p>ostgote@gmx.net changed:
</p>
<p>            What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  CC|                            |ostgote@gmx.net
</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>------- Additional Comments From ostgote@gmx.net  2005-03-07 00:57 PST
-------
I guess this is because of Bug 71916 (only prot 70 is allowed). So this
seems a
duplicate of Bug 158888 to me.
</p>
<p>See also Bug 194220.
</p>
<p></p>
<p>--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
</p>
<p></p>
<p>--
Alessandro Selli
Tel: 340.839.73.05
http://alessandro.route-add.net
</p>
<p></p>
</card>
</wml>
