Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher); Wed, 17 Aug 2005 02:43:20 -0500 (CDT) Received: from galaxy.systems.pipex.net ([62.241.162.31]) by glockenspiel.complete.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1E5IZo-00011e-A7 for gopher@complete.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 02:43:18 -0500 Received: from [192.168.2.15] (81-86-122-208.dsl.pipex.com [81.86.122.208]) by galaxy.systems.pipex.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E83D1E0001BD for <gopher@complete.org>; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 08:42:26 +0100 (BST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v733) In-Reply-To: <200508170238.TAA31518@floodgap.com> References: <200508170238.TAA31518@floodgap.com> Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Message-Id: <8D2286E8-3702-4204-AE5C-8A4D1F8303C0@jesusstolemymoped.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Rich Roberts <rich@jesusstolemymoped.com> Subject: [gopher] Re: basic newb info Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 08:42:34 +0100 To: gopher@complete.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.733) X-Spam-Status: No (score 0.0): none X-Virus-Scanned: by Exiscan on glockenspiel.complete.org at Wed, 17 Aug 2005 02:43:18 -0500 X-archive-position: 1083 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org X-original-sender: rich@jesusstolemymoped.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: gopher@complete.org List-help: <mailto:ecartis@complete.org?Subject=help> List-unsubscribe: <mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=unsubscribe> List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: Gopher <gopher.complete.org> X-List-ID: Gopher <gopher.complete.org> List-subscribe: <mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=subscribe> List-owner: <mailto:jgoerzen@complete.org> List-post: <mailto:gopher@complete.org> List-archive: <http://www.complete.org/mailinglists/archives/> X-list: gopher

On 17 Aug 2005, at 03:38, Cameron Kaiser wrote:

>> Sometimes, the simplest wikis are the most fun to set up :) >> TwikiWiki, for instance, is the Emacs of the wiki world, and (IMO) >> just as cumbersome (I'm a vi guy, so I can say things like that). >> >> It would seem to me that any wiki that's set up should be done so in >> the same spirit as gopher itself: Not a lot of bells and whistles, >> but easy to use and administer. >> > > I repeat, why isn't some clever fellow working on a gopher-hostable > wiki? > It could be updated either by telnetting to a port, or accepting E- > mail > (using a keyphrase to trivially filter spam), or some other clever > way. > I might even work on one myself except that I have to finish > Veronica-2's > upgrades and the "secret project" first. >

Everyone loves teh sekrit projects ;)

Is there an authentication layer in the gopher protocol? And, correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't most wiki's flat file based rather than db driven?

If we used the former, surely some clever beggar (not me, cause i baint no good at this coding lark) could either...

Find/ write a script that would turn each flat file into a gopher parseable page, and runs each time something is modified... Do something else (there were no two options after all. damn kids. stole my coffee. )

================================================ It's 2am. Do you know who's reading your email? Public key: http://jesusstolemymoped.com/users.php?mode=profile&uid=4 Fingerprint: 97E1 1EBD 7E63 18CC A8B3 2742 FAFA 61B1 D718 052A =================================================