<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN"
"http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="index" title="Text File" newcontext="true">
<p>
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher);
 Wed, 16 Nov 2005 21:49:33 -0600 (CST)
Received: from mo-69-69-114-6.sta.sprint-hsd.net ([69.69.114.6]
 helo=erwin.lan.complete.org)
	by glockenspiel.complete.org with esmtps
	(with TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
	(TLS peer CN erwin.complete.org, certificate verified)
	(Exim 4.50)
	id 1EcaUt-000061-Ox; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 21:31:55 -0600
Received: from heinrich.lan.complete.org ([10.200.0.15]
 helo=heinrich.complete.org)
	by erwin.lan.complete.org with esmtps
	(with TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
	(TLS peer CN christoph.complete.org, certificate verified)
	(Exim 4.50)
	id 1EcaUX-0003WZ-8X; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 21:31:17 -0600
Received: from jgoerzen by heinrich.complete.org with local
	(Exim 4.54)
	id 1EcWOm-0005aw-Ax; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 17:09:04 -0600
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 17:09:04 -0600
From: John Goerzen &lt;jgoerzen@complete.org&gt;
To: gopher@complete.org
Subject: [gopher] Re: ????????
Message-ID: &lt;20051116230904.GL21186@complete.org&gt;
References: &lt;E1EbMO4-0007GZ-TV@glockenspiel.complete.org&gt;
 &lt;20051113235514.GA24410@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG&gt;
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: &lt;20051113235514.GA24410@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG&gt;
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Spam-Status: No (score 0.1): AWL=-0.000, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.05
X-Virus-Scanned: by Exiscan on glockenspiel.complete.org at Wed,
 16 Nov 2005 21:31:55 -0600
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-archive-position: 1155
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org
Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org
X-original-sender: jgoerzen@complete.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: gopher@complete.org
List-help: &lt;mailto:ecartis@complete.org?Subject=help&gt;
List-unsubscribe: &lt;mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=unsubscribe&gt;
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-Id: Gopher &lt;gopher.complete.org&gt;
X-List-ID: Gopher &lt;gopher.complete.org&gt;
List-subscribe: &lt;mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=subscribe&gt;
List-owner: &lt;mailto:jgoerzen@complete.org&gt;
List-post: &lt;mailto:gopher@complete.org&gt;
List-archive: &lt;http://www.complete.org/mailinglists/archives/&gt;
X-list: gopher
</p>
<p>On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 05:55:14PM -0600, Benn Newman wrote:
&gt; spam-Status: Yes (score 6.0): AWL=-1.926, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK=3.037, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS=0.516, FROM_HAS_ULINE_NUMS=0.361, MSGID_FROM_MTA_ID=1.704, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100=1.485, RAZOR2_CHECK=0.15,
&gt; +URIBL_SBL=0.629
&gt;
&gt; What&#x27;s the point of the spam &#x27;detector&#x27; if you don&#x27;t use it? (Though I suppose the cut
&gt; off is above 6.0.) :-p
</p>
<p>The cut-off to actually send a message to the far reaches of /dev/null
is a bit higher than the cut-off to set the spam status in the header to
Yes.  Occasionally a few legit mails sneak by at this lowe level.  (I
think the cutoff for deletion is 6.5)
</p>
<p>-- John
</p>
<p></p>
</card>
</wml>
