<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN"
"http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="index" title="Text File" newcontext="true">
<p>
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher);
 Wed, 04 Jan 2006 00:16:48 -0600 (CST)
Received: from outbound3.mail.tds.net ([216.170.230.93])
	by glockenspiel.complete.org with esmtp
	(Exim 4.50)
	id 1Eu1x1-0004QR-CX
	for gopher@complete.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2006 00:16:48 -0600
Received: from outaamta02.mail.tds.net (outaamta02.mail.tds.net
 [216.170.230.32])
	by outbound3.mail.tds.net (8.13.4/8.12.2) with ESMTP id k046GdHT014721
	for &lt;gopher@complete.org&gt;; Wed, 4 Jan 2006 00:16:39 -0600 (CST)
Received: from wybotnnas01-pool0-a222.wybotn.tds.net ([66.222.116.222])
          by outaamta02.mail.tds.net with ESMTP
          id
 &lt;20060104061638.IEPT23063.outaamta02.mail.tds.net@wybotnnas01-pool0-a222.wybotn.tds.net&gt;
          for &lt;gopher@complete.org&gt;; Wed, 4 Jan 2006 00:16:38 -0600
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 00:16:53 -0600
From: Jeff &lt;geph@nerdshack.com&gt;
To: gopher@complete.org
Subject: [gopher] Re: PyGopherd and Gopher+
References: &lt;20051231155642.GA9489@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG&gt;
 &lt;20051231164643.GB28740@katherina.lan.complete.org&gt;
 &lt;20051231173023.GA2684@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG&gt;
 &lt;op.s2pefzakvbderv@wybotnnas01-pool0-a14.wybotn.tds.net&gt;
 &lt;20060101165144.GA2143@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG&gt;
 &lt;op.s2qt03v8vbderv@wybotnnas01-pool0-a61.wybotn.tds.net&gt;
 &lt;20060104044609.GB12981@katherina.lan.complete.org&gt;
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: &lt;op.s2ubqfi6vbderv@wybotnnas01-pool0-a222.wybotn.tds.net&gt;
In-Reply-To: &lt;20060104044609.GB12981@katherina.lan.complete.org&gt;
User-Agent: Opera M2/8.51 (Win32, build 7712)
X-Spam-Status: No (score 0.1): AWL=0.081
X-Virus-Scanned: by Exiscan on glockenspiel.complete.org at Wed,
 04 Jan 2006 00:16:48 -0600
X-archive-position: 1232
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org
Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org
X-original-sender: geph@nerdshack.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: gopher@complete.org
List-help: &lt;mailto:ecartis@complete.org?Subject=help&gt;
List-unsubscribe: &lt;mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=unsubscribe&gt;
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-Id: Gopher &lt;gopher.complete.org&gt;
X-List-ID: Gopher &lt;gopher.complete.org&gt;
List-subscribe: &lt;mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=subscribe&gt;
List-owner: &lt;mailto:jgoerzen@complete.org&gt;
List-post: &lt;mailto:gopher@complete.org&gt;
List-archive: &lt;http://www.complete.org/mailinglists/archives/&gt;
X-list: gopher
</p>
<p>On Tue, 03 Jan 2006 22:46:09 -0600, John Goerzen &lt;jgoerzen@complete.org&gt;
wrote:
</p>
<p>&gt;  * It is still a great annoyance to have meta information conveyed
&gt;    by the referring object rather than the object itself.
&gt;
&gt;    I wonder if we may consider extending the protocol so that a
&gt;    request of a certain form would cause a compliant server
&gt;    to send a single line of meta information before sending the
&gt;    document as usual.  This single line of meta information could
&gt;    even be in the form of a regular (gopher++ is it now?) menu line.
&gt;
&gt;    It seems to generally be the case, both in filesystems and in
&gt;    browsers, that meta-information is obtained by the object itself,
&gt;    not the object the refers to it.  IE sometimes looks at the
&gt;    extension of a file to determine what sort of file it is, and this
&gt;    is generally considered a bug.
&gt;
&gt;    By doing this, we could also reform the gopher:// URL schema.
&gt;
&gt; -- John
</p>
<p>Gopher &#x27;headers&#x27; do seem to be the least obtrusive/best solution.
</p>
<p>--
Jeff
</p>
<p></p>
</card>
</wml>
