Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher); Tue, 04 Apr 2006 20:57:15 -0500 (CDT) Received: from c-24-1-211-91.hsd1.tx.comcast.net ([24.1.211.91] helo=turquoise.pongonova.net) by glockenspiel.complete.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1FQxGi-00056N-0a for gopher@complete.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2006 20:57:15 -0500 Received: by turquoise.pongonova.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9C3C1676; Tue, 4 Apr 2006 20:57:13 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 20:57:13 -0500 From: brian@pongonova.net To: gopher@complete.org Subject: [gopher] Re: DARN! CAMERON!! Message-ID: <20060405015713.GA28615@pongonova.net> References: <20060405002522.GA29838@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> <200604050057.k350vmfu015806@floodgap.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200604050057.k350vmfu015806@floodgap.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i X-Spam-Status: No (score 2.0): AWL=-0.007, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.05, MANY_EXCLAMATIONS=0, NO_REAL_NAME=0.178, RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL=1.655, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=0.137 X-Virus-Scanned: by Exiscan on glockenspiel.complete.org at Tue, 04 Apr 2006 20:57:15 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-archive-position: 1282 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org X-original-sender: brian@pongonova.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: gopher@complete.org List-help: <mailto:ecartis@complete.org?Subject=help> List-unsubscribe: <mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=unsubscribe> List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: Gopher <gopher.complete.org> X-List-ID: Gopher <gopher.complete.org> List-subscribe: <mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=subscribe> List-owner: <mailto:jgoerzen@complete.org> List-post: <mailto:gopher@complete.org> List-archive: <http://www.complete.org/mailinglists/archives/> X-list: gopher

Is that code even maintained? I don't believe djb does much with qmail anymore, just wondering about his other code...

--Brian

On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 05:57:48PM -0700, Cameron Kaiser wrote: > > > > Rob Braun say that xinetd/inted etc. are bad! (No idea why he maintains > > > > xinetd though) > > > > He does? Where? > > > In irc://irc.freenode.net/opendarwin > > Hmm. Well, we'll see if he says it on the record. > > While we're on the subject, I've been looking at the ucspi-tcp toolkit. Is > there any interest in making Bucktooth compatible with it? > > http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp.html > > -- > --------------------------------- personal: http://www.armory.com/~spectre/ --- > Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * ckaiser@floodgap.com > -- Heisenberg may have been here. --------------------------------------------- >