Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher); Thu, 01 Jun 2006 00:44:34 -0500 (CDT) Received: from c-24-1-211-91.hsd1.tx.comcast.net ([24.1.211.91] helo=turquoise.pongonova.net) by glockenspiel.complete.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Flfyu-0000Qf-FE for gopher@complete.org; Thu, 01 Jun 2006 00:44:33 -0500 Received: by turquoise.pongonova.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 588BE648; Wed, 31 May 2006 23:45:04 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 23:45:04 -0500 From: brian@pongonova.net To: gopher@complete.org Subject: [gopher] Gopher in the "new millennium"? Message-ID: <20060601044504.GB6438@pongonova.net> References: <021d01c683fc$ed46df80$0500a8c0@Mars> <20060601035740.32473.qmail@web35501.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060601035740.32473.qmail@web35501.mail.mud.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i X-Spam-Status: No (score 2.0): AWL=-0.006, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.05, NO_REAL_NAME=0.178, RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL=1.655, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=0.137 X-Virus-Scanned: by Exiscan on glockenspiel.complete.org at Thu, 01 Jun 2006 00:44:33 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-archive-position: 1300 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org X-original-sender: brian@pongonova.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: gopher@complete.org List-help: <mailto:ecartis@complete.org?Subject=help> List-unsubscribe: <mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=unsubscribe> List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: Gopher <gopher.complete.org> X-List-ID: Gopher <gopher.complete.org> List-subscribe: <mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=subscribe> List-owner: <mailto:jgoerzen@complete.org> List-post: <mailto:gopher@complete.org> List-archive: <http://www.complete.org/mailinglists/archives/> X-list: gopher

On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 08:57:40PM -0700, JumpJet Mailbox wrote: > Please note that I believe ALL Gopher sites intended for public > Internet network access in the new millenium should use port 70.

This comment has me randomly wondering if gopher and other low-bandwidth, text-based protocols will make a comeback if a two-tiered Internet becomes reality.

--Brian