<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN"
"http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="index" title="Text File" newcontext="true">
<p>
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher);
 Fri, 02 Jun 2006 13:09:32 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from dns2.eurnetcity.net ([80.68.196.9])
	by glockenspiel.complete.org with esmtp
	(Exim 4.50)
	id 1FmE5Q-0006dP-AR
	for gopher@complete.org; Fri, 02 Jun 2006 13:09:31 -0500
Received: from brillante.route-add.net (brillante.route-add.net [80.68.194.26]
 (may be forged))
	by dns2.EurNetCity.NET (8.11.6p2-20030924/8.11.6) with SMTP id k52HO8q18969
	for &lt;gopher@complete.org&gt;; Fri, 2 Jun 2006 19:24:08 +0200
Received: from [192.168.110.4] (marana [192.168.110.4])
	by brillante.route-add.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF738102A
	for &lt;gopher@complete.org&gt;; Fri,  2 Jun 2006 20:08:39 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: &lt;44807EA2.3050005@route-add.net&gt;
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 20:08:34 +0200
From: Alessandro Selli &lt;dhatarattha@route-add.net&gt;
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i586; en-US;
 rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060405 SeaMonkey/1.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gopher@complete.org
Subject: [gopher] Re: RFC drafts
References: &lt;20060518150511.18149.qmail@web35505.mail.mud.yahoo.com&gt;
 &lt;20060601212829.GA3749@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG&gt;
 &lt;006201c68658$28a93660$220110ac@YTHERIX&gt;
 &lt;20060602164335.GA13333@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG&gt;
In-Reply-To: &lt;20060602164335.GA13333@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG&gt;
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-EurNetCity-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more
 information
X-EurNetCity-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: dhatarattha@route-add.net
X-Spam-Status: No (score 0.1): AWL=0.065
X-Virus-Scanned: by Exiscan on glockenspiel.complete.org at Fri,
 02 Jun 2006 13:09:31 -0500
X-archive-position: 1311
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org
Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org
X-original-sender: dhatarattha@route-add.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: gopher@complete.org
List-help: &lt;mailto:ecartis@complete.org?Subject=help&gt;
List-unsubscribe: &lt;mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=unsubscribe&gt;
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-Id: Gopher &lt;gopher.complete.org&gt;
X-List-ID: Gopher &lt;gopher.complete.org&gt;
List-subscribe: &lt;mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=subscribe&gt;
List-owner: &lt;mailto:jgoerzen@complete.org&gt;
List-post: &lt;mailto:gopher@complete.org&gt;
List-archive: &lt;http://www.complete.org/mailinglists/archives/&gt;
X-list: gopher
</p>
<p>Benn Newman wrote:
&gt; On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 11:21:01AM -0400, Trevor wrote:
&gt;
&gt;&gt; this intrigues me.
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; (sorry i don&#x27;t look familiar. been lurking the last couple of years.)
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; one downfall, i feel, with gopher is it is clear text. has anyone thought
&gt;&gt; about, besides me, an sGopher protocol? i think gopher would get more
&gt;&gt; mainstream use if it had security built into it. many companies refuse to
&gt;&gt; use anything that sends clear text over a wire. just a thought.
&gt;&gt;
&gt; Gopher over SSL/TLS (from my understanding) is easy and already possible.
&gt; You can use something like stunnel (on the server) and socat (on the client)
&gt;
  I agree.  Only, you will have to use a non-standard port where the
SSL-gopher server
will listen to, since there is no IANA-assigned &quot;gophers&quot; port like
there is a &quot;https&quot; port
(443 tcp).
</p>
<p></p>
<p>--
Alessandro Selli
Tel: 340.839.73.05
http://alessandro.route-add.net
</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
</card>
</wml>
