Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher); Fri, 16 Jun 2006 05:15:37 -0500 (CDT) Received: from smtp2.atlavia.it ([213.199.4.210] helo=smtp.atlavia.it) by glockenspiel.complete.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1FrBMS-0000jd-9A for gopher@complete.org; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 05:15:36 -0500 Received: from kanthaka.localdomain (ppp-62-123-13-78.dial.atlanet.it [62.123.13.78] (may be forged)) by smtp.atlavia.it (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id k5GAqlp13177 for <gopher@complete.org>; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 12:52:47 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by kanthaka.localdomain (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k5GAF8bB003133 for <gopher@complete.org>; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 12:15:09 +0200 Message-ID: <449284AB.5050700@route-add.net> Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 12:15:07 +0200 From: Alessandro Selli <dhatarattha@route-add.net> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.2) Gecko/20060413 Fedora/1.0.1-1.fc5 SeaMonkey/1.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gopher@complete.org Subject: [gopher] Re: RFC drafts References: <E1FmQg4-0002H3-32@glockenspiel.complete.org> In-Reply-To: <E1FmQg4-0002H3-32@glockenspiel.complete.org> Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No (score 0.1): AWL=-0.000, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.05 X-Virus-Scanned: by Exiscan on glockenspiel.complete.org at Fri, 16 Jun 2006 05:15:36 -0500 X-archive-position: 1314 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org X-original-sender: dhatarattha@route-add.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: gopher@complete.org List-help: <mailto:ecartis@complete.org?Subject=help> List-unsubscribe: <mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=unsubscribe> List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: Gopher <gopher.complete.org> X-List-ID: Gopher <gopher.complete.org> List-subscribe: <mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=subscribe> List-owner: <mailto:jgoerzen@complete.org> List-post: <mailto:gopher@complete.org> List-archive: <http://www.complete.org/mailinglists/archives/> X-list: gopher

Andrew Mahan wrote: > or SSH-2? Kinda like SFTP works

My /etc/services file tells me sftp uses port 115 tcp/udp.

> -----Original Message----- > From: gopher-bounce@complete.org [mailto:gopher-bounce@complete.org] On > Behalf Of Alessandro Selli > Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 11:09 AM > To: gopher@complete.org > Subject: [gopher] Re: RFC drafts > > Benn Newman wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 11:21:01AM -0400, Trevor wrote: >> >>> this intrigues me. >>> >>> (sorry i don't look familiar. been lurking the last couple of years.) >>> >>> one downfall, i feel, with gopher is it is clear text. has anyone thought > >>> about, besides me, an sGopher protocol? i think gopher would get more >>> mainstream use if it had security built into it. many companies refuse to > >>> use anything that sends clear text over a wire. just a thought. >>> >> Gopher over SSL/TLS (from my understanding) is easy and already possible. >> You can use something like stunnel (on the server) and socat (on the > client) >> > I agree. Only, you will have to use a non-standard port where the > SSL-gopher server > will listen to, since there is no IANA-assigned "gophers" port like > there is a "https" port > (443 tcp). > >

-- Alessandro Selli Tel: 340.839.73.05 http://alessandro.route-add.net