<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN"
"http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="index" title="Text File" newcontext="true">
<p>
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher);
 Thu, 01 Jun 2006 15:43:13 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from natsluvver.rzone.de ([81.169.145.176])
	by glockenspiel.complete.org with esmtp
	(Exim 4.50)
	id 1Flu0c-00064F-3C
	for gopher@complete.org; Thu, 01 Jun 2006 15:43:13 -0500
Received: from GO.ncc-1701a (p54A3472F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.163.71.47])
	by post.webmailer.de (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k51KgumP020424
	for &lt;gopher@complete.org&gt;; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 22:42:57 +0200 (MEST)
Subject: [gopher] Re: Trying to add a link to jumpjet site
From: Dennis Schulmeister &lt;dennis@windows3.de&gt;
To: gopher@complete.org
In-Reply-To: &lt;20060601144734.344a8cf3@work1.hal3000.cx&gt;
References: &lt;021d01c683fc$ed46df80$0500a8c0@Mars&gt;
	 &lt;20060601035740.32473.qmail@web35501.mail.mud.yahoo.com&gt;
	 &lt;20060601144734.344a8cf3@work1.hal3000.cx&gt;
Content-type: text/plain
Organization: Karlsruhe
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 22:42:54 +0200
Message-Id: &lt;1149194575.31224.3.camel@localhost.localdomain&gt;
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Status: No (score 0.9): AWL=-0.916, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.832
X-Virus-Scanned: by Exiscan on glockenspiel.complete.org at Thu,
 01 Jun 2006 15:43:13 -0500
X-archive-position: 1302
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org
Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org
X-original-sender: dennis@windows3.de
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: gopher@complete.org
List-help: &lt;mailto:ecartis@complete.org?Subject=help&gt;
List-unsubscribe: &lt;mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=unsubscribe&gt;
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-Id: Gopher &lt;gopher.complete.org&gt;
X-List-ID: Gopher &lt;gopher.complete.org&gt;
List-subscribe: &lt;mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=subscribe&gt;
List-owner: &lt;mailto:jgoerzen@complete.org&gt;
List-post: &lt;mailto:gopher@complete.org&gt;
List-archive: &lt;http://www.complete.org/mailinglists/archives/&gt;
X-list: gopher
</p>
<p>Hi everybody,
</p>
<p>to my mind Chris has a point.
</p>
<p>See, you even have to make changes to your registry in order to browse
some gopher menus with Internet Explorer. How many users can we expect
to do so? Let alone how many users still remember gopher if they know it
at all? And those who remember, how many of them really use Internet
Explorer (for browsing gopher space)?
</p>
<p>Greetings,
Dennis
</p>
<p></p>
<p>Am Donnerstag, den 01.06.2006, 14:47 -0500 schrieb Chris:
&gt; I think I&#x27;d like to disgree and point out web browsers dont make the best gopher browsers as we know. There are many many gophers _not_ on port 70 and many reasons to do so. I dont feel we should make some &quot;rule&quot; such as this (which doesn&#x27;t exist now) especially on behalf of M$ IE. Gopher protocol does not limit anyone to port 70 lets not try and change that.
</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
</card>
</wml>
