Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher); Thu, 01 Jun 2006 16:28:49 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mx.freeshell.org ([192.94.73.18] helo=sdf.lonestar.org) by glockenspiel.complete.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Fluij-0006K6-KA for gopher@complete.org; Thu, 01 Jun 2006 16:28:48 -0500 Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (IDENT:newmanbe@otaku.freeshell.org [192.94.73.2]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.13.5.20060308/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k51LSTv8003381 for <gopher@complete.org>; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 21:28:29 GMT Received: (from newmanbe@localhost) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.13.5.20060308/8.12.8/Submit) id k51LSTRB023313 for gopher@complete.org; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 16:28:29 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 16:28:29 -0500 From: Benn Newman <newmanbe@sdf.lonestar.org> To: gopher@complete.org Subject: [gopher] Re: RFC drafts Message-ID: <20060601212829.GA3749@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> References: <20060518150511.18149.qmail@web35505.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060518150511.18149.qmail@web35505.mail.mud.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Spam-Status: No (score 0.1): AWL=0.090, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.05 X-Virus-Scanned: by Exiscan on glockenspiel.complete.org at Thu, 01 Jun 2006 16:28:48 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-archive-position: 1303 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org X-original-sender: newmanbe@sdf.lonestar.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: gopher@complete.org List-help: <mailto:ecartis@complete.org?Subject=help> List-unsubscribe: <mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=unsubscribe> List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: Gopher <gopher.complete.org> X-List-ID: Gopher <gopher.complete.org> List-subscribe: <mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=subscribe> List-owner: <mailto:jgoerzen@complete.org> List-post: <mailto:gopher@complete.org> List-archive: <http://www.complete.org/mailinglists/archives/> X-list: gopher

On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 08:05:11AM -0700, JumpJet Mailbox wrote: > Persons seriously interested in giving input about how Gopher will be officially codified in the RFCs should examine and respond to the authors of documents: > > draft-hoffman-gopher-uri-03.txt > draft-murali-url-gopher.txt > > Both of these documents are available on JumpJet ( gopher://home.jumpjet.info/11\Begin_Here\References ). These RFCs will be as important to the Gopher community as RFC1436, and it is imperative that they be addressed while still in final draft stage. Those are *old*. What exactly do they change about the way we (try) to do things? I noticed some Gopher+ stuff but nothing else of much interest. -- Benn Newman | newmanbe@sdf.lonestar.org | gopher://igneous-rock.homeunix.net -- Attached file included as plaintext by Ecartis --

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (NetBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAkR/W/0ACgkQFE65lPR8xrG++wCfaGq/L8+X+q8D0wVseh3Peudl YCoAnjC/vRr0iuQhu3efoI9Qo+uPPu2c =u5ya -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----