<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN"
"http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="index" title="Text File" newcontext="true">
<p>
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher);
 Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:01:49 -0600 (CST)
Received: from static-71-170-11-156.dllstx.dsl-w.verizon.net ([71.170.11.156]
 helo=turquoise.pongonova.net)
	by glockenspiel.complete.org with esmtp
	(Exim 4.63)
	id 1HLm2d-0007tE-5C
	for gopher@complete.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:01:49 -0600
Received: by turquoise.pongonova.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 781AE688; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:59:19 -0600 (CST)
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:59:19 -0600
From: brian@pongonova.net
To: gopher@complete.org
Subject: [gopher] More ammo for reducing bandwidth
Message-ID: &lt;20070226185919.GA20295@pongonova.net&gt;
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i
X-Spam-Status: No (score 0.6): AWL=0.000, NO_REAL_NAME=0.55
X-Virus-Scanned: by Exiscan on glockenspiel.complete.org at Mon,
 26 Feb 2007 14:01:49 -0600
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-archive-position: 1503
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org
Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org
X-original-sender: brian@pongonova.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: gopher@complete.org
List-help: &lt;mailto:ecartis@complete.org?Subject=help&gt;
List-unsubscribe: &lt;mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=unsubscribe&gt;
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-Id: Gopher &lt;gopher.complete.org&gt;
X-List-ID: Gopher &lt;gopher.complete.org&gt;
List-subscribe: &lt;mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=subscribe&gt;
List-owner: &lt;mailto:jgoerzen@complete.org&gt;
List-post: &lt;mailto:gopher@complete.org&gt;
List-archive: &lt;http://www.complete.org/mailinglists/archives/&gt;
X-list: gopher
</p>
<p>I know this probably isn&#x27;t news to anybody who subscribes to this
list, but I think it&#x27;s interesting that not a single so-called
industry &quot;expert&quot; is calling for a reduction in bandwidth
usage...instead it&#x27;s all about building more capacity:
</p>
<p>http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/bus/ptech/stories/022607dnbusbandwidth.36418ea.html
</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
</card>
</wml>
