<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN"
"http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="index" title="Text File" newcontext="true">
<p>
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher);
 Sat, 14 Apr 2007 20:55:08 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from floodgap.com ([66.159.214.137] ident=elvis)
	by glockenspiel.complete.org with esmtp
	(Exim 4.63)
	id 1HctxK-0007Cf-Ir
	for gopher@complete.org; Sat, 14 Apr 2007 20:55:07 -0500
Received: (from spectre@localhost)
	by floodgap.com (6.6.6.666.1/2007.01.03) id l3F1t3xx010754
	for gopher@complete.org; Sat, 14 Apr 2007 18:55:03 -0700
From: Cameron Kaiser &lt;spectre@floodgap.com&gt;
Message-Id: &lt;200704150155.l3F1t3xx010754@floodgap.com&gt;
Subject: [gopher] Re: Mozilla bugs about Gopher, and a dangerous one
In-Reply-To: &lt;895893.53997.qm@web35501.mail.mud.yahoo.com&gt; from JumpJet
 Mailbox at &quot;Apr 14, 7 05:41:36 pm&quot;
To: gopher@complete.org
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 18:55:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL39 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Status: No (score 0.0): AWL=0.012
X-Virus-Scanned: by Exiscan on glockenspiel.complete.org at Sat,
 14 Apr 2007 20:55:07 -0500
X-archive-position: 1553
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org
Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org
X-original-sender: spectre@floodgap.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: gopher@complete.org
List-help: &lt;mailto:ecartis@complete.org?Subject=help&gt;
List-unsubscribe: &lt;mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=unsubscribe&gt;
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-Id: Gopher &lt;gopher.complete.org&gt;
X-List-ID: Gopher &lt;gopher.complete.org&gt;
List-subscribe: &lt;mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=subscribe&gt;
List-owner: &lt;mailto:jgoerzen@complete.org&gt;
List-post: &lt;mailto:gopher@complete.org&gt;
List-archive: &lt;http://www.complete.org/mailinglists/archives/&gt;
X-list: gopher
</p>
<p>&gt;   But tell me, Why &quot;historical&quot;?  You make it sound like Gopher is
&gt; something that belongs on a dusty shelf in a museum.  Isn&#x27;t Gopher a
&gt; LIVING protocol?  Shouldn&#x27;t we always be thinking of Gopher as a Modern,
&gt; Useful, Current, Active, piece of the great Internet network; and therefore
&gt; always trying to make Gopher Better, Healthier, and more Relavant to today?
</p>
<p>Sure, but as a bridge to the past, I think it would be fun to also cover the
service on the old port number like the old Veronicas did, just with the
new database.
</p>
<p>Note that essentially we&#x27;re on the same page here, or I wouldn&#x27;t be writing
*new* Gopher software! :)
</p>
<p>--
------------------------------------ personal: http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ --
  Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * ckaiser@floodgap.com
-- Computers are like air conditioners. They stop working if you open windows.
</p>
<p></p>
</card>
</wml>
