<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN"
"http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="index" title="Text File" newcontext="true">
<p>
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher);
 Mon, 16 Apr 2007 00:48:19 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.225])
	by glockenspiel.complete.org with esmtp
	(Exim 4.63)
	id 1HdK4X-0001dt-SZ
	for gopher@complete.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 00:48:18 -0500
Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s17so1551987wxc
        for &lt;gopher@complete.org&gt;; Sun, 15 Apr 2007 22:48:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=XkmE5jnaJY7fhaHvym8UR+0Akuf0NpEcf6Sxx35iaA4HbvmFUDLXdVu7aobG9woD5JEY6tAFKc0YPxkmFJeg/axXJZXq+D9ctMqxBQdanKaYz4Yjc7j5KLpUd/zaTQXq3doa5TQnuG6W1g3EXkBHlZOzlypKvOOWSPkANQvoFIw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=B3WJBXQUlqqZJh8CJqdYyNtI8VeFq2Z/y8rqwJrRKzXt7gtOiv0JSeoaLMPcJgeaqL1B6Q9Q/hHopOnVce/zoexpXFxmFfzjxPPulYNZ6mCoQhksI3vb57wcdxuZMLprgLwpyxVii7g0A/cLIfo792T2ZhZ7V5h5ROHeG6eM2PA=
Received: by 10.114.80.4 with SMTP id d4mr1765730wab.1176702494358;
        Sun, 15 Apr 2007 22:48:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.181.7 with HTTP; Sun, 15 Apr 2007 22:48:14 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: &lt;f705f7020704152248m43aaae50gd83f24ec330024fb@mail.gmail.com&gt;
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 07:48:14 +0200
From: Stegozor &lt;stegozor@gmail.com&gt;
To: gopher@complete.org
Subject: [gopher] Re: Mozilla bugs about Gopher, and a dangerous one
In-Reply-To: &lt;200704111249.l3BCnTEF014776@floodgap.com&gt;
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: &lt;evijud$35h$1@sea.gmane.org&gt;
	 &lt;200704111249.l3BCnTEF014776@floodgap.com&gt;
X-Spam-Status: No (score 0.0): none
X-Virus-Scanned: by Exiscan on glockenspiel.complete.org at Mon,
 16 Apr 2007 00:48:18 -0500
X-archive-position: 1587
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org
Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org
X-original-sender: stegozor@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: gopher@complete.org
List-help: &lt;mailto:ecartis@complete.org?Subject=help&gt;
List-unsubscribe: &lt;mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=unsubscribe&gt;
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-Id: Gopher &lt;gopher.complete.org&gt;
X-List-ID: Gopher &lt;gopher.complete.org&gt;
List-subscribe: &lt;mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=subscribe&gt;
List-owner: &lt;mailto:jgoerzen@complete.org&gt;
List-post: &lt;mailto:gopher@complete.org&gt;
List-archive: &lt;http://www.complete.org/mailinglists/archives/&gt;
X-list: gopher
</p>
<p>On 4/11/07, Cameron Kaiser &lt;spectre@floodgap.com&gt; wrote:
&gt; &gt; https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351748
&gt; &gt; (Remove UI for Gopher proxy settings)
&gt;
&gt; Wow, this sucks. Everyone get on this and complain. It&#x27;s the slippery
&gt; slope to removal. Thanks for pointing it out, and kudos to Aaron for
&gt; jumping on it also.
</p>
<p>Well,  I finally wrote a complaint. Hope this is going to calm down a
little bit the will of the reporter to remove the UI for Gopher proxy
settings.
</p>
<p>&gt; &gt; https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158888
&gt; &gt; (implement better handling for gopher on non default ports)
&gt;
&gt; Voted. I&#x27;m not even sure why they did this that way.
</p>
<p>I recently found this: gopher://sipb.mit.edu/1B:Internet%20whois%20servers
The result with Mozilla derivatives is bad :(
</p>
<p>&gt; &gt; https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=273459
&gt; &gt; (most gopher-*.gif images are unused)
&gt;
&gt; Voted. This looks like a good solution to implement.
</p>
<p>I had a look to these gifs (C:\Program
Files\mozilla.org\SeaMonkey\res\html under my Windows Millennium).
They&#x27;re pretty nice. It would be nice if they were used, indeed.
</p>
<p>&gt; &gt; https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202196
&gt; &gt; (wrong protocol for host names containing &quot;gopher&quot;)
&gt;
&gt; I think I agree with the naysayers on this one. Although it would be nice
&gt; to just type in gopher.floodgap.com and not get helsinki&#x27;s *web* server,
&gt; I think this is a case where the solution will be worse than the problem for
&gt; many users.
</p>
<p>Probably. I had hesitated a lot, but when I saw that Lynx was doing
this guess quite efficiently, I voted: how many websites begin with
http://gopher... ? But anyway, this probably is not so important and
indeed some newbies could whine if the bug was corrected.
</p>
<p>&gt; &gt; https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=326034
&gt; &gt; (Gopher module shouldn&#x27;t try to interpret text into URLs)
&gt;
&gt; This is mine! Vote for it! Aaron&#x27;s the only other communicator recently of
&gt; note.
</p>
<p>Voted :)
</p>
<p>&gt; &gt; Feel free to correct my English ;)
&gt;
&gt; I&#x27;m sure it&#x27;s better than me speaking your native language
</p>
<p>Bleh. I was expecting a comment like &quot;oh, why do you say that? Your
English is better than perfect &quot;.
:-p
</p>
<p>&gt; (what is it, anyway?).
</p>
<p>Hmmm. Do you remember that you have a file in a foreign language
you&#x27;ll put on floodgap in one of your next lives? ;)
</p>
<p>&gt; Thanks very much for posting these. I&#x27;ve got the relevant ones on my
&gt; cc list now.
</p>
<p>I think that given the opposition the bug will remain open for quite a
while. Since the assignee is also the reporter, I don&#x27;t think he will
easily accept a wontfix, but anyway, now he&#x27;s under surveillance :)
</p>
<p></p>
</card>
</wml>
