Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher); Wed, 02 May 2007 12:31:04 -0500 (CDT) Received: from 85-10-193-136.clients.your-server.de ([85.10.193.136]) by glockenspiel.complete.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) id 1HjIfK-00005v-WA for gopher@complete.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 12:31:03 -0500 Received: from localhost (port-ip-213-211-226-171.reverse.mdcc-fun.de [213.211.226.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by 85-10-193-136.clients.your-server.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EA7938049B27 for <gopher@complete.org>; Wed, 2 May 2007 19:30:21 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 19:30:55 +0200 From: Christoph Lohmann <20h@r-36.net> To: gopher@complete.org Subject: [gopher] Re: Gopherfs and stuff Message-ID: <20070502193055.3c48a33f@localhost> In-Reply-To: <200705021631.l42GVS8C015144@floodgap.com> References: <20070502173249.37620096@localhost> <200705021631.l42GVS8C015144@floodgap.com> X-Mailer: Rohrpost Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No (score 0.2): AWL=0.185 X-Virus-Scanned: by Exiscan on glockenspiel.complete.org at Wed, 02 May 2007 12:31:03 -0500 X-archive-position: 1618 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org X-original-sender: 20h@r-36.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: gopher@complete.org List-help: <mailto:ecartis@complete.org?Subject=help> List-unsubscribe: <mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=unsubscribe> List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: Gopher <gopher.complete.org> X-List-ID: Gopher <gopher.complete.org> List-subscribe: <mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=subscribe> List-owner: <mailto:jgoerzen@complete.org> List-post: <mailto:gopher@complete.org> List-archive: <http://www.complete.org/mailinglists/archives/> X-list: gopher

Good evening.

Am Wed, 2 May 2007 09:31:28 -0700 (PDT) schrieb Cameron Kaiser <spectre@floodgap.com>:

> I don't understand why you are bothering then. It makes no sense to > release a server program no one is "supposed to run" for a protocol > you don't like, and won't support.

Read the copyright line in the source code. Nothing else applies.

> I'm all for more diversity in the gopher community, but your > statements don't make any sense. I'm glad you're offering the choice, > but you don't inspire much confidence in your work when there are > other alternatives that are supported by enthusiasts, who do use > them, and who believe the protocol offers certain advantages.

Use my gopherd! Sorry for the irony.

End of discussion.

Sincerely,

Christoph Lohmann