<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN"
"http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="index" title="Text File" newcontext="true">
<p>
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher);
 Sat, 30 Jun 2007 11:47:26 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from floodgap.com ([66.159.214.137] ident=elvis)
	by glockenspiel.complete.org with esmtp
	(Exim 4.63)
	id 1I4g6V-00027x-72
	for gopher@complete.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2007 11:47:26 -0500
Received: (from spectre@localhost)
	by floodgap.com (6.6.6.666.1/2007.01.03) id l5UGlN7p014342
	for gopher@complete.org; Sat, 30 Jun 2007 09:47:23 -0700
From: Cameron Kaiser &lt;spectre@floodgap.com&gt;
Message-Id: &lt;200706301647.l5UGlN7p014342@floodgap.com&gt;
Subject: [gopher] Re: Bucktooth questions
In-Reply-To: &lt;20070630153223.GB6722@pongonova.net&gt; from &quot;brian@pongonova.net&quot;
 at &quot;Jun 30, 7 10:32:23 am&quot;
To: gopher@complete.org
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 09:47:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL39 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Status: No (score 0.0): AWL=0.006
X-Virus-Scanned: by Exiscan on glockenspiel.complete.org at Sat,
 30 Jun 2007 11:47:26 -0500
X-archive-position: 1641
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org
Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org
X-original-sender: spectre@floodgap.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: gopher@complete.org
List-help: &lt;mailto:ecartis@complete.org?Subject=help&gt;
List-unsubscribe: &lt;mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=unsubscribe&gt;
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-Id: Gopher &lt;gopher.complete.org&gt;
X-List-ID: Gopher &lt;gopher.complete.org&gt;
List-subscribe: &lt;mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=subscribe&gt;
List-owner: &lt;mailto:jgoerzen@complete.org&gt;
List-post: &lt;mailto:gopher@complete.org&gt;
List-archive: &lt;http://www.complete.org/mailinglists/archives/&gt;
X-list: gopher
</p>
<p>&gt; &gt; That&#x27;s interesting. Why, I wonder, does it has an egid of root? That would
&gt; &gt; explain the tainting.
&gt;
&gt; OK, there seems to be some BSD weirdness going on.  &quot;groups = yes&quot;
&gt; must be defined in the xinetd.conf file for the EGID to be set
&gt; correctly.  All works well now without the hacks.
</p>
<p>Whew!
</p>
<p>Still, I&#x27;ll make a note of this in the documentation and I do appreciate
the report.
</p>
<p>--
------------------------------------ personal: http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ --
  Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * ckaiser@floodgap.com
-- He who Laughs, Lasts. ------------------------------------------------------
</p>
<p></p>
</card>
</wml>
