Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher); Wed, 01 Aug 2007 11:32:40 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cc1021802-a.groni1.gr.home.nl ([82.73.133.177] helo=artemis.voidzero.net) by glockenspiel.complete.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) id 1IGH7j-0000gZ-9N for gopher@complete.org; Wed, 01 Aug 2007 11:32:40 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by artemis.voidzero.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75EAF6198F5 for <gopher@complete.org>; Wed, 1 Aug 2007 18:32:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from artemis.voidzero.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (artemis.lan [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CQlfObGogH3r for <gopher@complete.org>; Wed, 1 Aug 2007 18:32:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPv6:2001:838:39b:1:248:2cff:fe3a:de4f] (anubis.voidzero.net [IPv6:2001:838:39b:1:248:2cff:fe3a:de4f]) by artemis.voidzero.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CB786198F0 for <gopher@complete.org>; Wed, 1 Aug 2007 18:32:32 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <46B0B5D5.9090409@w00f.eu> Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 18:33:25 +0200 From: Mark <mark@w00f.eu> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070720) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gopher@complete.org Subject: [gopher] Re: Problem with SiMpLeMaChInEs References: <f705f7020707312020g4a663f25xe9f24544ef661d9f@mail.gmail.com> <618171.61504.qm@web35503.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20070801152758.GA18712@pongonova.net> In-Reply-To: <20070801152758.GA18712@pongonova.net> Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No (score 1.7): AWL=-0.281, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=1.988 X-Virus-Scanned: by Exiscan on glockenspiel.complete.org at Wed, 01 Aug 2007 11:32:40 -0500 X-archive-position: 1682 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org X-original-sender: mark@w00f.eu Precedence: bulk Reply-to: gopher@complete.org List-help: <mailto:ecartis@complete.org?Subject=help> List-unsubscribe: <mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=unsubscribe> List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: Gopher <gopher.complete.org> X-List-ID: Gopher <gopher.complete.org> List-subscribe: <mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=subscribe> List-owner: <mailto:jgoerzen@complete.org> List-post: <mailto:gopher@complete.org> List-archive: <http://www.complete.org/mailinglists/archives/> X-list: gopher

brian@pongonova.net wrote: > Also, the word "should" doesn't mandate compliance. It's a > recommendation. > I agree; that's why it's called an RFC and not something else. :)

The port 70 discussion started because someone forwarded their port 70 internet to a different port on LAN? My idea about this, is that it is never a good idea to run a service on a different internal port than it's external port. This because it's a definite way to show difficulties like the one being discussed now. A rather pointless discussion anyway, imho. :)

--Mark