Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher); Sun, 23 Dec 2007 10:47:33 -0600 (CST) Received: from static-71-170-11-156.dllstx.dsl-w.verizon.net ([71.170.11.156] helo=turquoise.pongonova.net) by glockenspiel.complete.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) id 1J6Tz9-00020U-5B for gopher@complete.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2007 10:47:33 -0600 Received: by turquoise.pongonova.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 901EF726; Sun, 23 Dec 2007 10:48:16 -0600 (CST) Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 10:48:16 -0600 From: brian@pongonova.net To: gopher@complete.org Subject: [gopher] Re: Using WikkaWiki as a gopher client/proxy Message-ID: <20071223164816.GA9703@pongonova.net> References: <20071223121852.GA9043@pongonova.net> <200712231626.lBNGQDZ3014962@floodgap.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200712231626.lBNGQDZ3014962@floodgap.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i X-Spam-Status: No (score 0.6): AWL=0.000, NO_REAL_NAME=0.55 X-Virus-Scanned: by Exiscan on glockenspiel.complete.org at Sun, 23 Dec 2007 10:47:33 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-archive-position: 1759 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org X-original-sender: brian@pongonova.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: gopher@complete.org List-help: <mailto:ecartis@complete.org?Subject=help> List-unsubscribe: <mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=unsubscribe> List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: Gopher <gopher.complete.org> X-List-ID: Gopher <gopher.complete.org> List-subscribe: <mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=subscribe> List-owner: <mailto:jgoerzen@complete.org> List-post: <mailto:gopher@complete.org> List-archive: <http://www.complete.org/mailinglists/archives/> X-list: gopher

On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 08:26:13AM -0800, Cameron Kaiser wrote: > Incidentally, if you run Bucktooth on the same server, you can use -isproxy > to "talk to yourself" without TCP sockets. However, it looks like you're > going more general-purpose with this, which definitely will be more widely > applicable.

That was actually my initial approach, until I discovered -isproxy only accesses locally. I briefly thought about hacking at the Bucktooth code, then thought better of it :)

--Brian