<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN"
"http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<card id="index" title="Text File" newcontext="true">
<p>
                               High-Risk Series
</p>
<p>1.     Farmers Home Administration&#x27;s Farm Loan Programs.  HR-93-1.
       December 1992.  Letter Report.  35 pp.  Filename: HR1
</p>
<p>       GAO provided information on the Farmers Home Administration&#x27;s
       (FmHA) management of direct and guaranteed farm loan programs and
       federal farm properties, focusing on FmHA failure to comply with
       loan and property management standards and program policies which
       contribute to financial risks.
</p>
<p>       GAO found that: (1) FmHA attempted to provide high-risk farmers
       with temporary credit until they were able to secure commercial
       credit and protect the taxpayers&#x27; investment; (2) 70 percent of
       the $20 billion in outstanding FmHA loans were either delinquent
       or restructured to prevent delinquency; (3) FmHA reduced $7.6
       billion in delinquent debt due to loan defaults; (4) repeated loan
       servicing worsened borrowers&#x27; financial conditions by increasing
       their debt and reducing equity; (5) FmHA field offices often
       failed to follow their own standards for making loans, servicing
       loans, and managing property; (6) FmHA and congressional loan
       making, loan-servicing, and inventory management policies
       increased FmHA and taxpayers&#x27; vulnerability to losses; and (7)
       FmHA and Congress need to establish a system to ensure that FmHA
       field offices follow loan standards and enact policy and program
       changes to reduce the loan programs&#x27; exposure to risk.
</p>
<p>2.     Guaranteed Student Loans.  HR-93-2.  December 1992.  Letter
       Report.  40 pp.  Filename:  HR2
</p>
<p>       GAO reviewed the Department of Education&#x27;s management of the
       Guaranteed Student Loan Program, focusing on the: (1) program&#x27;s
       structural flaws; and (2) lack of adequate incentives to prevent
       loan defaults.
</p>
<p>       GAO found that: (1) the federal government&#x27;s risk of loan losses
       has increased greatly as the program has evolved; (2) the
       government has increased its financial exposure, since it provided
       interest subsidies to lenders as well as full reimbursement to
       lenders and guaranty agencies for any loan defaults; (3)
       incentives do not adequately encourage participants to do more to
       prevent defaults; (4) Education has a history of mismanagement and
       poor oversight of the program&#x27;s activities; and (5) Education has
       inadequate financial and management information systems that
       contain inaccurate and incomplete data, conducted little oversight
       of the lenders and guaranty agencies, experienced high turnover in
       key management positions and has not hired staff with adequate
       skills, and a management structure that inhibited effective
       program improvement.
</p>
<p>3.     Bank Insurance Fund.  HR-93-3.  December 1992.  Letter Report.  46
       pp.  Filename: HR3
</p>
<p>       GAO reviewed the Bank Insurance Fund, focusing on the factors that
       contributed to the depletion of the Fund&#x27;s reserves and the need
       for improved accounting rules and bank examinations.
</p>
<p>       GAO noted that: (1) during the 1980s, U.S. banks made riskier
       loans to increase their customer base and fight competition from
       other domestic and foreign financial service vendors; (2) weak
       internal controls, flawed corporate governance systems, and lax
       regulatory supervision put banks and the Bank Insurance Fund at
       risk; (3) federal regulators have not acted to effectively tighten
       flexible accounting rules; (4) successful implementation of the
       Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) act reforms depends
       on FDIC use of its authority to rebuild the fund and the quality
       of regulators&#x27; oversight efforts; and (5) Congress should consider
       legislating certain regulatory accounting principles for
       nonperforming loans and more rigorous reporting to regulators.
</p>
<p>4.     Resolution Trust Corporation.  HR-93-4.  December 1992.  Letter
       Report. 45 pp.  Filename: HR4
</p>
<p>       GAO reviewed the Resolution Trust Corporation&#x27;s (RTC) cleanup of
       the thrift industry, focusing on: (1) RTC management of its asset
       disposition and contracting activities; (2) RTC information
       systems; and (3) reduction of thrift cleanup costs.
</p>
<p>       GAO found that RTC: (1) has recovered about 95 percent of the book
       value of the financial assets it has sold, but faces losses from
       contingent liability on already-sold assets and potential asset
       mismanagement by contractors; (2) has not adequately planned or
       executed its real estate disposition, and did not perform
       evaluations of its disposition results until its third year of
       operation; (3) is incapable of properly monitoring contractors&#x27;
       performance and minimizing costs because of poor contract planning
       and administration; and (4) information systems are inadequate and
       contain inaccurate information, although RTC is developing
       improvements to some systems. GAO also found that: (1) the total
       cleanup cost will be around $335 billion, if RTC minimizes its
       losses by improving its control over asset management and
       disposition; and (2) inadequate funding has prevented RTC from
       resolving a number of failed thrifts, which has increased its
       operating losses and taxpayers&#x27; costs.
</p>
<p>5.     Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.  HR-93-5.  December 1992.
       Letter Report.  36 pp.  Filename: HR5
</p>
<p>       GAO reviewed the financial condition of the Pension Benefit
       Guaranty Corporation (PBGC), focusing on: (1) the growing PBGC
       deficit; (2) weaknesses in the Department of Labor&#x27;s, Internal
       Revenue Service&#x27;s (IRS), and independent public accountants&#x27;
       efforts to detect pension plan abuses that place plan assets at
       risk; and (3) pressures Congress faces to expand PBGC guarantees
       to cover insurance annuitants and other groups.
</p>
<p>       GAO found that: (1) the growing PBGC deficit threatens the
       insurance program&#x27;s long-term financial viability; (2) effective
       enforcement of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
       requirements is essential to reducing the risk to the insurance
       program; (3) ERISA violations and the collection of deliquent and
       underpaid premiums have added to PBGC financial losses and
       increased its administrative burden; (4) Labor and the IRS have
       made progress in improving their enforcement efforts, but problems
       remain; (5) Labor and IRS efforts have been hindered by scarce
       resources relative to the size of the plan and disappointing
       enforcement targeting results; (6) recent failures of several
       large insurance companies have raised concerns that federal
       oversight of plans&#x27; selections of insurance annuity providers is
       inadequate; and (7) inadequate federal oversight may add to
       increasing pressures Congress faces to expand PBGC guarantees to
       cover insurance annuities if the existing guarantees fail to
       adequately protect pension benefits.
</p>
<p>6.     Medicare Claims.  HR-93-6.  December 1992.  Letter Report.  32 pp.
       Filename:  HR6
</p>
<p>       GAO provided information on the Health Care Financing
       Administration&#x27;s (HCFA) management of the Medicare Program and
       whether insufficient funding exposes the program to unnecessary
       loss through waste, fraud, and abuse.
</p>
<p>       GAO found that: (1) Medicare losses resulting from fraud, waste,
       and abuse could total 10 percent of the nation&#x27;s total health care
       costs; (2) HCFA relies on contractors to process Medicare claims
       and protect program funds with payment safeguards; (3) HCFA
       failure to properly manage contractors&#x27; safeguards and
       insufficient funding exposed the program to waste, fraud, and
       abuse; (4) HCFA contractors often failed to investigate fraud
       complaints raised by Medicare beneficiaries and failed to recover
       $170 million in overpayments from hospitals; (5) HCFA contractors
       paid nearly $2 billion in claims for which other insurers were
       responsible; and (6) HCFA needs to strengthen contractor
       oversight, reduce excessive payments, and tighten billing
       controls.
</p>
<p>7.     Defense Weapons Systems Acquisition.  HR-93-7.  December 1992.
       Letter Report.  50 pp.  Filename:  HR7
</p>
<p>       GAO reviewed the Department of Defense&#x27;s (DOD) annual expenditure
       of billions of dollars to acquire new weapons systems, focusing on
       DOD determination, planning, budgeting, and acquisition of major
       weapons requirements.
</p>
<p>       GAO found that: (1) while the services conduct considerable
       analyses to justify major acquisitions, these analyses were
       narrowly focused, and did not fully consider alternative
       solutions, including the joint acquisition of systems with other
       services; (2) cost growth and schedule delays were among the
       oldest and most visible problems associated with DOD weapon system
       acquisition; (3) DOD tendency to overestimate the amount of future
       funding available for defense, and underestimate program costs,
       has resulted in program acquisition strategies that are
       unreasonable or risky at best; (4) the most troublesome
       characteristic of DOD acquisition strategies was the high degree
       of concurrency between the development and production of weapons;
       (5) DOD has compromised or not adequately considered design
       considerations such as reliability, maintainability, and logistics
       support during the acquisition process.
</p>
<p>8.     Defense Contract Pricing.  HR-93-8.  December 1992.  Letter
       Report.  37 pp.  Filename:  HR8
</p>
<p>       GAO reviewed the Department of Defense&#x27;s (DOD) contracting
       practices, focusing on the significant risks it faces as a result
       of overpriced contracts.
</p>
<p>       GAO found that: (1) DOD found $3.67 billion in overcharges in
       defense contracts in fiscal years 1987 through 1991, of which 37
       percent was due to subcontractors&#x27; overcharges; (2) DOD required
       major contractors to establish adequate cost-estimating systems
       and include subcontract price evaluations in their contract
       proposals; (3) despite strengthened regulations and emphasis on
       subcontract pricing, overcharges due to inflated subcontractor
       estimates continued; (4) DOD oversight of contract pricing was
       inadequate, and corrective actions were insufficient; (5) the
       Defense Contract Audit Agency was unaware of 88 percent of the
       subcontracts because prime contractors were not required to
       provide lists of their subcontractors; (6) contracting officers
       did not adequately review contractors&#x27; actions and enforce
       compliance; (7) the DOD audit follow-up system did not provide
       accurate and complete information on many high-risk contractors&#x27;
       cost-estimating systems; and (8) DOD could ensure fair and
       reasonable profits for defense firms if it established a financial
       reporting system that provides information comparing defense and
       nondefense contract costs.
</p>
<p>9.     Department of Energy Contract Management.  HR-93-9.  December
       1992. Letter Report.  41 pp.  Filename:  HR9
</p>
<p>       GAO reviewed the Department of Energy&#x27;s (DOE) contract management
       weaknesses, focusing on DOE failure to adequately oversee
       contractors that manage and operate the nuclear weapons complex
       and national laboratory network.
</p>
<p>       GAO noted that: (1) DOE contract management weaknesses have led to
       mismanagement of federal property and funds; (2) DOE is required
       to reimburse contractors for money and materials stolen by
       contractor employees and for fines the contractors incurred for
       environmental law violations; (3) vulnerability to waste, fraud,
       abuse, and mismanagement stemmed from long-standing inadequacies
       in DOE oversight of contactors&#x27; operations and activities; (4) 70
       percent of DOE management and operating contracts did not employ
       standard contract clauses used by other federal agencies; and (5)
       DOE contracts gave contractors excessive latitude, increased the
       government&#x27;s financial risk, and restricted its ability to control
       costs, since DOE failed to provide objective criteria for award or
       management fees paid to contractors.
</p>
<p>10.    Superfund Program Management.  HR-93-10.  December 1992.  Letter
       Report. 41 pp.  Filename:  HR10
</p>
<p>       GAO provided information on the Environmental Protection Agency&#x27;s
       (EPA) management of the Superfund Program, focusing on EPA: (1)
       recovery of Superfund clean-up costs from private parties; and (2)
       inadequate attention to contract management.
</p>
<p>       GAO found that: (1) EPA failed to base its Superfund expenditures
       on adequate cost-benefit assessments and lacked sufficient program
       administration to control escalating costs; (2) EPA lacked an
       adequate system for assigning clean-up priorities and determining
       Superfund sites&#x27; health and environmental risks in comparison to
       other environmental problems; (3) EPA collected only 10 percent of
       the potential $5.7 billion in recoverable funds from responsible
       parties; (4) the lack of complete data on past recovery efforts,
       failure to control collection efforts, and Superfund&#x27;s legal
       restrictions which exclude recovery of indirect costs and interest
       limited EPA ability to recover more funds from responsible
       parties; and (5) EPA needed to develop additional risk-based
       planning approaches to assigning clean-up priorities, place
       greater emphasis on recovering program costs, and strengthen
       contract management.
</p>
<p>11.    NASA Contract Management.  HR-93-11.  December 1992.  Letter
       Report.  42 pp.  Filename:  HR11
</p>
<p>       GAO reviewed the National Aeronautics and Space Administration&#x27;s
       (NASA) lack of adequate controls over contract management and
       related activities.
</p>
<p>       GAO found that: (1) NASA failure to realistically plan for the
       budgetary resources to fund its programs can affect its ability to
       manage its contracts; (2) NASA technical oversight procedures and
       its cost reporting, property management, accounting, and
       information systems did not adequately ensure that contractor
       payments and the government-owned property were managed
       effectively; and (3) NASA field centers did not always fully
       comply with governmentwide, agency, or center requirements when
       awarding and modifying contracts.
</p>
<p>12.    Defense Inventory Management.  HR-93-12.  December 1992.  Letter
       Report. 39 pp.  Filename:  HR12
</p>
<p>       GAO reviewed the Department of Defense&#x27;s (DOD) management of
       military supplies, focusing on DOD maintenance of: (1) high excess
       inventory levels; and (2) systems for determining supply needs.
</p>
<p>       GAO found that: (1) each military service and the Defense
       Logistics Agency (DLA) individually maintained inventories of
       spare and repair parts in accordance with their own projected
       needs; (2) DOD estimated that its excess inventory costs over $30
       billion; (3) the services&#x27; excess inventories increased during the
       1980s by 150 to 240 percent; (4) DOD oversight and inventory
       information and control systems were inadequate and ineffective
       and led to the overstatement of supply requirements; (5) DOD must
       undergo an organizational culture change, such as adopting
       commercial practices, to reduce the costs of inventory procurement
       and maintenance; and (6) DOD is increasing cost awareness in its
       business practices by such means as charging the full cost of
       items and services to the military units that use them.
</p>
<p>13.    Internal Revenue Service Receivables.  HR-93-13.  December 1992.
       Letter Report.  42 pp.  Filename:  HR13
</p>
<p>       GAO reviewed the Internal Revenue Service&#x27;s (IRS) ability to
       collect the tax debts owed to the federal government, focusing on
       what IRS needs to do to increase collections.
</p>
<p>       GAO found that: (1) IRS estimates that it will never collect 75
       percent of the tax debt, since tax records are inaccurate, it
       cannot locate delinquent taxpayers, and deliquent taxpayers are
       unable to pay; (2) for fiscal year 1991, IRS collections of
       accounts receivable actually declined by 5 percent while the IRS
       receivable inventory increased by 15 percent; and (3) conditions
       that interfered with IRS ability to collect unpaid taxes included
       lack of complete account information, an inefficient collection
       process, the need to balance collection efforts with taxpayer
       protection, a highly decentralized organizational structure, and
       uneven staffing among offices.
</p>
<p>14.    Managing the Customs Service.  HR-93-14.  December 1992.  Letter
       Report. 37 pp.  Filename:  HR14
</p>
<p>       GAO reviewed the U.S. Customs Service&#x27;s ability to effectively
       enforce trade law and maintain effective financial controls.
</p>
<p>       GAO found that: (1) Customs needs to define trade enforcement in
       terms of increased detection of violations, increased voluntary
       compliance by importers, and increased collections of duties; (2)
       Customs needs to develop an institutional standard for measuring
       the significance of trade violations; (3) Customs has not managed
       its information resources effectively; (4) Customs employees often
       lack basic information needed to assess the effectiveness of trade
       enforcement efforts; (5) Customs continues to face the challenge
       of establishing adequate accountability and control over its
       resources; and (6) Customs needs to improve both its accounting
       for and controls over property.
</p>
<p>15.    Management of Overseas Real Property.  HR-93-15.  December 1992.
       Letter Report.  33 pp.  Filename:  HR15
</p>
<p>       GAO provided information on the Department of State&#x27;s Office of
       Foreign Building Operations&#x27; (FBO) management of government
       overseas real estate programs, focusing on the need for increased
       government facility oversight to prevent mismanagement and waste.
</p>
<p>       GAO found that: (1) unapproved overseas facility construction,
       over-standard housing for foreign-based U.S. employees,
       insufficient maintenance requirements, and questionable real
       estate acquisition and disposal decisions contributed to program
       waste and mismanagement; (2) the FBO $2.1-billion security
       construction program lacked clear program objectives, planning,
       and coordination which resulted in significant delays and cost
       overruns; (3) internal control weaknesses in FBO property
       management included inadequate overseas post oversight, inadequate
       financial information systems, insufficient funding for facility
       rehabilitation and maintenance, and poor integration and planning
       of foreign policy and security objectives; (4) FBO completed only
       8 of the 57 projects under the security construction program,
       failed to adequately assess contractor performance, and lacked
       sufficient staff to manage overseas facility construction; and (5)
       FBO needs to establish focused priorities for overseas
       construction projects, enhance and increase contractor
       evaluations, hire additional qualified staff to survey maintenance
       conditions at foreign posts, require yearly maintenance
       inspections, streamline and update housing standards, and improve
       information systems.
</p>
<p>16.    Federal Transit Administration Grant Management.  HR-93-16.
       December 1992.  Letter Report.  39 pp.  Filename:  HR16
</p>
<p>       GAO reviewed the Department of Transportation&#x27;s Federal Transit
       Administration&#x27;s (FTA) management and oversight of federal transit
       grants.
</p>
<p>       GAO found that: (1) FTA did not give high priority to oversight of
       federal grants but instead relied on assurances by grantees that
       they would manage federal funds properly; (2) problems often went
       undetected and uncorrected because FTA failed to oversee grantees&#x27;
       activities effectively; and (3) FTA has made a commitment to
       improving grant oversight by performing annual risk assessments of
       each grant recipient, establishing detailed procedures for
       monitoring recipients, and adopting a comprehensive enforcement
       system.
</p>
<p>17.    Asset Forfeiture Programs.  HR-93-17.  December 1992.  Letter
       Report.  33 pp.  Filename:  HR17
</p>
<p>       GAO reviewed the Department of Justice&#x27;s and the U.S. Customs
       Service&#x27;s management and disposition of seized and forfeited
       assets, focusing on: (1) program changes; and (2) areas needing
       sustained management attention.
</p>
<p>       GAO found that: (1) legislative changes allowing more seizures and
       forfeitures increased Justice&#x27;s and Customs&#x27; seized property
       inventories by almost 600 percent by 1992; (2) Congress
       established special funds with proceeds from asset sales to pay
       asset forfeiture-related expenses; (3) in 1987, Justice and
       Customs established policies to minimize the unnecessary holding
       of cash by speeding up the deposit of cash not needed in Treasury
       accounts; (4) Justice and Customs have developed systems to
       improve information handling needed for decision making; (5) a
       1990 legislative change allowed the agencies to process all
       uncontested forfeitures administratively rather than judicially,
       which sped up the process considerably; (6) Justice and Customs
       have agreed to a pilot test of consolidating their postseizure
       management and disposition of noncash seized property inventories;
       (7) Justice and Customs are developing joint asset-sharing
       guidelines and oversight policies and procedures in response to
       asset-sharing concerns expressed by state and other officials; and
       (8) Justice has increased its use of title searches in seizing
       real property to protect owners&#x27; property rights.
</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
</card>
</wml>
