Text File

Aucbvax.1752 fa.apollo utzoo!duke!decvax!ucbvax!Rivanciw@Darcom-HQ Mon Jun 15 09:15:19 1981 Planning Considerations for Workstations

Let me first say that I have been pleased with the substance of the messages on personal workstations. I am one of the program managers for office automation at the US Army Development and Readiness Command (DARCOM). I wanted to become a part of this roundtable discussion in the hopes that I could keep abreast of the technology of personal workstations. The messages generated to date have proved very enriching.

Here are a couple of topics that I would like us to discuss:

COST/BENEFITS:

It seems that many of you are interested in this topic based on the number of messages making mention of prices. What most planners seem to forget is that there are too sides to cost/benefits - the costs and the benefits. A lot of emphasis over the past several years has been geared to an evaluation of the benefits of office automation. Ther is another side - the cost.

DARCOM is taking an aggressive role in personal workstations from the cost/user aspect. I am confident that the benefits to managers, professionals, and administrative employees will be evident. What we are concerned with now is the cost of providing this service.

Our initial goal was to provide a workstation for Office Automation users at a ONE TIME cost of $5K. Quite an aggressive goal in 1976. We now have available micros that can provide electronic mail, calendar systems, tickler functions, meeting scheduler, word processing, electronic filing system, suspense tools, and some other tools to a user for a ONE TIME cost of $5800.00. Of course, system maintenance would be an annual cost, but that will always be around with any system.

Now, when one can get all those services for under $6K purchase price/user, a whole lot of the cost/benefit problems are moot. On a pure lease deal, it is now possible for a user in DARCOM to "try" office automation for a very low price. If the user decides the service is worth $5K they buy it. If they decide it is not, they quit leasing having made a very small expenditure.

The demands for office automation, based on this low cost methodology, have grown astronomically in DARCOM. We can no way supply all the OA users with systems. Therefore, in the rare instance when a user finds he/she does not want to continue service, the equipment is immediately picked up by another user.

PERSONAL WORKSTATION ARCHITECTURE

The key to DARCOM's OA success has been an aggressive, carefully thoughtout architecture for the personal workstation. Several messges mentioned that a large computer should be used to process the big runs to keep the samll micro from becoming overburdened. That's communications. Several messages asked the question of whether the personal workstation should be a small version of a big machine, just running slower.

DARCOM's architecture has addressed both of these issues. Our personal workstations run the SAME software as our large CPUs and Minicomputers. The SAME.

Likewise, our personal workstations communicate with larger machines to process large runs, querry central data bases, or send documents/mail. Right now I am composing this messages many communications links away from the ARPANET. My computer is NOT a host on the arpanet. However, when I give the send command to my mail system, it gets my message to the ARPANET. And if I want to send a message to someone on another computer that is not on the arpanet it will get it ther also. From the user's viewpoint the command is the same. We have a RELAY computer that handles the multi-port communications requirements in the background.

At any rate, what I am trying to say is that the key to a successful implementation of personal workstations in office automation is not just the bells and whistles of one system vs another. The key is an well planned, long range, flexible architecture that allows for the extensive amount of communications necessary to support today's office.

Randy

----------------------------------------------------------------- gopher://quux.org/ conversion by John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org> of http://communication.ucsd.edu/A-News/

This Usenet Oldnews Archive article may be copied and distributed freely, provided:

1. There is no money collected for the text(s) of the articles.

2. The following notice remains appended to each copy:

The Usenet Oldnews Archive: Compilation Copyright (C) 1981, 1996 Bruce Jones, Henry Spencer, David Wiseman.